Wilwock
Member
- Sep 26, 2021
- 395
- 1,011
- 266
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
cmon man, don't be like that. Give dev a chance, it's just a first release, dev debut project with only 330 renders and you already completely destroyed this game by giving one star reviewSorry, but there are too many forced and obvious things, we are forced to accept, it is not explained what the game of the couple consists of, but from the first dance, instead, the game tells us that it is all about the fall of the wife, so, why talk about the couple if then we have to make the wife, the usual cheating slut, the usual cliché.
Really now?Price of Desires [Ep.1.1] [DogWalker]
Win/Linux and Mac [72 MB]
You must be registered to see the links-You must be registered to see the links-You must be registered to see the links
This is unofficial. Use at your own risk.
You can join myYou must be registered to see the linksserver for more games and other content.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Come on, did I do this for nothing?Really now?
https://f95zone.to/threads/price-of-desires-ep-1-1-dogwalker.250895/post-16662311
I updated my post together with when I updated the thread.
Sadly yes. Need to announce doing compressions in the Game Compression Request thread. That way if another one has announced it they may keep you from wasting time. And you can check.Come on, did I do this for nothing?
I'm removing it![]()
The first time it happened is fine because MMC said that FMC being desperate and irrational is out of character, yet they flip flop again about being paranoid/nervous of being watched (first the wife in the room, then the husband during the dance.). What feels like a deliberate inconsistency to showcase tension and personality now feels like a writing flaw.You also repeat yourself a lot. That conversation after the guy propositions them, they each keep saying or thinking the same thing, over and over. "Before one of us wanted to do things normally, now the other does instead" I got it after the 5th time one of them said or thought that, but it isn't something that needs to be pointed out in the first place, the first conversation happened only minutes ago. As well, the fact that they KEEP flipping back and forth over who wants to do it and who doesn't gets old very quickly. Someone acting like an idea is insane after pushing it themselves so hard is frustrating to read.
I dont think its a writing flaw to show flip flops, the couple are entering a new dynamic or trying a new thing for the first time, they are bound to be nervous and not sure about what they want. Its natural to flip flop, you cant expect them to go hey i want this new thing, and then boom a moment later they are into it, there should be space for uncertainty as they are trying to explore new things.The first time it happened is fine because MMC said that FMC being desperate and irrational is out of character, yet they flip flop again about being paranoid/nervous of being watched (first the wife in the room, then the husband during the dance.). What feels like a deliberate inconsistency to showcase tension and personality now feels like a writing flaw.
That would be fine, but you're not actually describing how it was done in the game. "They were unsure" is a ridiculous way to describe them each taking one side, then switching sides at the exact time as the other person, at least twice in a row. Despite no new information that might chance either of their minds being revealed. Uncertainty makes sense, how it was done is the problem. How quickly they became sure of doing that something that any sane person would assume is a scam is another problem lol.I dont think its a writing flaw to show flip flops, the couple are entering a new dynamic or trying a new thing for the first time, they are bound to be nervous and not sure about what they want. Its natural to flip flop, you cant expect them to go hey i want this new thing, and then boom a moment later they are into it, there should be space for uncertainty as they are trying to explore new things.
Hey some random dude offered us a life changing opportunity, lets agree or disagree about that opportunity in the first conversation itself without any doubts. That's not actually realistic. They are bound to struggle to come to a decision when they are exploring something they know nothing about for the first time.
I'm guessing this is the only place it occurs, right? Missed this one, sorry.
Nice.Hi guys, have added fixes and Android version:
Changelog:
Check it out
- Fix for MC1 name has been applied.
- Couple of dialogue fixes.
- Android version has been added.
You must be registered to see the links.
I dont know why these minor details which are actually completely useless for the overall story is soo important for people here? Criticism for the sake of criticism is never good. The overall story indicates it would be about a couple who are going to go on a wild ride together. Discussing these irrelevant details about how they agreed or why they flip flopped in a porn game is actually insaneThat would be fine, but you're not actually describing how it was done in the game. "They were unsure" is a ridiculous way to describe them each taking one side, then switching sides at the exact time as the other person, at least twice in a row. Despite no new information that might chance either of their minds being revealed. Uncertainty makes sense, how it was done is the problem. How quickly they became sure of doing that something that any sane person would assume is a scam is another problem lol.
This is my first game, so I’ve surely made plenty of mistakes, forgive me for that! I’ll fix these issues in the next one.Nice.
Just a heads up, as I was scrolling through the Ep1 script fixing the MC1 name issues, noticed a few “math” coding errors with the stats. Not a lot, but there were a few = -1, instead of -=1. Just learning myself, so not 100% certain, but all the others had the +/- operator before the equal sign…
The stat hints option for the choices is marvelous. I wish more devs would include that option. Players that want to play “blind” can, those of us that like to at least have an idea what the choice does, do…
Given the stat hints, may be asking too much…lol, but an overall “counter”/stat status display would be nice.
Overall, pretty good start and set up. Room for improvement.
Certainly have my own preferences on how I would have shaped the story/stats, but it’s not my story…lol
Just some notes to consider…
You don’t have to make the guy a weak, sad sack to corrupt the wife…
Understandable if it’s the “story”, but people are tempted, seduced away from good spouses.
The wife is already contemplating escaping reality… wouldn’t take much for her to give in to temptation. And with a solid husband, it makes her “fall”/corruption more significant, consequential. Will he stay, will he go? Will he allow her to “play”? Will he want to even the “score”?
I mean, if the other dudes are all better, more appealing options, is the wife really being “corrupted”??
Any way, just offering feedback. Not my story, and these things have probably already been considered. Write the story you want. People will like it, or they won’t, can’t cater to/please everyone.
I swear though, while not the same set of circumstances…lol, the couple back and forth dynamic, she wants to be crazy while he’s the reasonable one, then he considers it to try and make her “happy” but then she flips to wanting to be the reasonable one, so much deja vu…![]()
Right?I dont know why these minor details which are actually completely useless for the overall story is soo important for people here? Criticism for the sake of criticism is never good. The overall story indicates it would be about a couple who are going to go on a wild ride together. Discussing these irrelevant details about how they agreed or why they flip flopped in a porn game is actually insane
Enjoy the hot stuff man.