- Thread starter Zorlun
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 3dcg anal sex big ass big tits bukkake cheating creampie exhibitionism female domination female protagonist footjob graphic violence groping group sex handjob humiliation interracial lesbian male domination masturbation milf multiple penetration oral sex spanking teasing titfuck urination vaginal sex voyeurism
No, Sugar Daddy means he's supporting her financially.
Again, no. They're not the same. There are similarities, but that's it.
It's prostitution but with only 1 customer.
- May 2, 2021
- 3,090
- 4,845
I am not sure what your experience is with marriage but my wife of 36 years is not a prostitute. Guess you have chosen poorly!
Can be seen that way and even dating. You buy her a meal take her out might get nothing. Spend the same on a hoe you get something. So why not the hoe? I have pimp potential and I could be one.
Because the women who get sugar daddies aren't prostitutes.
You can try to argue that the semantics and interpretations don't matter, but that's where you just continue to look foolish.
Happy to say, I've never been married and I doubt I ever will.
I wasn't literally saying that marriage is like a prostitute with one client, I was mocking that idiotic argument he tried to use.
- Sep 28, 2021
- 1,503
- 1,456
- May 28, 2018
- 440
- 465
Keep it civil please, there's no use to argue over something not worth your good mood and happy day. ^^
Hmm, I know the term, but at the same time, I knew it has having an ambiguity value.
From one side was someone fashionable, "trendy", elegant, supposed also to be somehow cultivated (though not forcibly in a general sense, and not forcibly especially intelligent) with refined tastes, especially in fashion and arts, who could effectively be attractive to women - though in the 60s many would more try to look the part to pick up, then being really "dandy" (actually, if I am not mistaken, the word itself goes way back, though not with all the same connotations, it was not created in the 60s).
From the other, it was also associated with what would have been described as "effeminate" (I guess nowadays this term would be banned as politically incorrect and offensive for some groups), and to people who would not just be homosexual and assume their sexuality, but rather making a show of it - though in some cases not even real homosexuals (considering the "picking up" part).
Somehow, the idea of pretending to be homosexual while not being it for real to pick up ladies by lowering their defenses and get in their trust, came back in the late 90s-early 2000s in some country, though in that case, maybe because homosexuality was more accepted, there was no big showing it off, just pretending to be.
At least, that is how I knew it.
The most basic definition of prostitute is normally a woman who obtains economic rewards in exchange for sexual activity, although whether the "economic" means only directly money, may depend from the point of view and amplitude of the definition, which can lead to different views socially, if not legally, with both the social and legal view also changing over time, geographic area and social context.
On the legal side, there is an extra definition, or definition with additional clause if you prefer, the old (I think it is still in force) Japanese law indicated prostitution was in reality illegal, but that prostitution was when a woman was having sex for money *with an unknow man*.
Results, I cannot confirm firsthand if it is true, but apparently there were places in Japan where they would simply make sure the customer had first a normal massage or something like that, so they could claim the woman knew already the guy - apparently (again, no direct experience) the police would busting them to disrupt their business from time to time, but the trick worked.
Though cannot use it for Myriam, she is not in Japan :-D
But I would upvote your suggestion, especially when people starting talking about wives, etc. things can get ugly very fast, would be better we stick to conversation about Myriam's next adventures :-D or anyway in general terms.
- May 24, 2018
- 1,522
- 3,208
>Next update has another Hammer scene
Color me interested.
Color me interested.
- Feb 12, 2021
- 434
- 533
"...is also known as a strong woman with..."???
n according to the w/t, as long as Myriam's willpower<10, she doesn't see thru the mummy's veil, so doesn't see the scarab on his forehead n remove it, thereby not trapping him back in the sarcophagus. yet no matter how low i set her willpower, this still happens automatically...i want her to allow the mummy to come inside her 3x, so she can free him n become his slave; is this no longer an option? thx
Your taskbar is blocking the rest of the text.
As for the mummy scene, she will always break from him (it was never a choice to become his slave). If you have the right amount of willpower, she will see the mummy fucking her and remove the scarab. If not, she will see the mummy as a human, but she will eventually see a bug on him (I think. It goes something like this.) and take it off, which is the scarab.
- Feb 12, 2021
- 434
- 533
taskbar top--taskbar side--full screen
sooo...?? n if it was "never a choice", then why does the w/t show it as an option to not see the mummy revealed?
