Viressa
Well-Known Member
- May 24, 2018
- 1,522
- 3,211
Yes, the language specifically used is parent-child, so father-daughter relationships would also be covered. Grandfather/Granddaughter too.Didn't know. Surprising, I admit. I know it is a silly question, but at this point... You wrote all the 50 states in USA criminalize mother-son incest, do you know if they do the same for father-daughter ?
The laws around this in the US are quite simple: "Statutory rape" literally means "rape by statute", that is, the law requires that this sexual encounter be treated as rape regardless of the victim's feelings as to whether they consented or not. If you touch someone under the legal age of consent in a sexual manner, you're a criminal and a sex offender. Even if they said they wanted it. Even if they pushed themselves onto you. Even if they lied about their age. Even if they showed you forged ID information to "prove" their false age. You are the adult in the situation and thus anything that happens is always considered to be your responsibility.Given the mess about "legal age of consent" and "statutory rape" (I had looked that up for another conversation, and in USA is a rather messy business, although they don't use the expression "statutory rape" at all), and what you just indicated, I fell one cannot assume anything.
I know about at least some other countries, and they tend to be a bit more straightforward and somehow simple, in general.
(This is actually something I didn't know when I was a teenager, I would lie about my age to mess around with adults and I had no idea that I was putting them in danger by doing so. So, kids, don't do that.)
The same goes for child pornography: If the person in the image was under the age of consent when it was taken, you're a sex offender just for having it, full stop. The prosecution does not have to prove that you knew they were underage, they only need to prove you possessed the images (and them temporarily existing in your browser cache from accessing them online counts as possession).
The one exception are so-called Romeo/Juliet laws, which vary state by state. In some states, if you turned 18 a day ago and she turns 17 tomorrow, you're a child rapist if you have sex with her. The purpose of Romeo/Juliet laws is to make an allowance to deal with this situation by allowing for an age gap: Sometimes one year, sometimes two, sometimes three. The largest gap is three years as far as I know.
If this sounds extreme and inflexible, it's because it is: The law is purposefully designed to err on the side of conviction. Even still, it's just about impossible to actually convict child rapists even with this very inflexible standard: It's estimated that 97% of them walk free.