Technically one and less honestly (started in November)This has been in development for 2 years already.
Sometimes I picture Japanese Hdevs as typical huge game studios, complete with corporate board room meetings and grueling crunch hours.
Burn out from what? moving some 2D gifs that get created every couple months, a few collision boxes and buttons? People need to recognize this for what it is.
It's pretty obvious that they don't work on these games full-time. Combine this with how soul-crushing normal Japanese work attitudes and it's pretty easy to see how a small team sacrificing some of their evenings and weekends might burn out.
I'm not sure how much awareness you have about game development, but programing takes a hefty amount of time for a small team and staring at it for days on end would leave anyone with a headache. Frankly, switching to AI would dramatically downgrade the visual quality and using it to write code would leave it more prone to glitches and unintended functionality. Better to let them take their time with a fine-toothed comb than rush it. The longer we wait, the better the product, and we have Monster Black Market for proof of such. At least, in my opinion
I have many years of experience in game development, which is why I can assure you it's not scary forbidden arts. What we have right here, is literally calling gif play functions, moving it along X axis and setting some collision hit box handlers to update variables and text. There is no multiplayer code here, there is no 3D space calculations or algorithms, there is no world geometry and shader manipulation, no physics simulations, etc.. "Programming" right here, is on the level of school graders learning to program.
True h Devs should use ai in coding and create scaffolding considering how bad coders most of them are and slow
What's wrong with you people, thinking AI can code?
And that right there is why we should absolutely ignore everything you have to say about programming as puerile ignorance
Utter waste of time. You would spend at minimum as much time deciphering and fixing that "scaffolding" as you would be spending just doing the job right in the first place.
AI in coding mostly helps with finding information on where to learn something, where to start searching about your problem, and i guess maybe advanced autofill. If you let the common AI's to write the code for you on anything even remotely complicated, you'll be spending more time fixing the code and wondering what part of the code the AI hallucinated.
Yeah pretty much. It should be thought of as a tool, not a worker.
Because it can somewhat with the right prompts frankly it can be used as a lever nowadays to increase productivity
