Isn't the point of this forum to discuss quality of the game and call out bad actors when they exist? So many people discover a game and take a look at the recent comments to see what state the game is. That's kind of the point. If all the criticism is buried then it might be difficult to make a decent choice if you were to give money to the dev or not, especially when some devs make it their personal mission to cover up any justified criticism they receive. This aint a game studio with stakeholders and executive board members, this is an independent dev team that has no one to stop them from saying or doing whatever they want, so it's important it get's pointed out, repeatedly, if there is unethical work being done.ok at this point: i gotta stop this -
move on people, if the first time you see the poisonous swamp, you seeit. you don't have to keep REPEATING the same motion over and over again. yes: he's milking. big whoop. you know, you can warn others, they know, and they MOVE ON.
guys. just look for something else. there are other roads besides the poisonous swamp path. take a detour(find another game, make discussions over there). at this point you're just giving people fuel/content and more fire. let the game rest. if people wanna be swindled by this dev, let them and move on.
There are definitely worst devs than Eromancer when it comes to shady practices, but no one can argue that it's been a very long time since their first game was announced (MATM) and they started collecting money with no finished game released since. At least they're a least somewhat transparent about it, though.