the art looks good but is there a lot of lesbian scene? from what i've been reading the game lacks scenes with the woman guard and the duke is kinda the "focus" but with only 10 scenes, so i guess if i want to romance women it's still better to wait it out?
RPGM Queen in Deficit [v0.29b] [BrokenTorpedo]
- Thread starter BrokenTorpedo
- Start date
You know what, at least the Duke route is over so we can focus on the more likable characters now
Prepare for this to age like milk when we have Duke meek route, Duke NTR route, Duke harem route, Duke stealing Gerard from you route, Duke DLC, and a brand new game starring the Duke as the main character. /j
Prepare for this to age like milk when we have Duke meek route, Duke NTR route, Duke harem route, Duke stealing Gerard from you route, Duke DLC, and a brand new game starring the Duke as the main character. /j
- May 7, 2019
- 247
- 845
It is planned, I want to do the prostitute event with mini-events, I think I will work on that once I have one or two more of those done
the duke storyline is never forced, you always could not give into his demand,
and I have since made so there's actaul benefits for conquering him by force.
Eh, what? sorry who?
I started this game in late 2018, and no there's only one person working on this game, that will be me.
Sorry, there's currently only one actual lesbian scene. unfortunately I can just navigate in so many plot lines at once.
Don't worry all it's left about him is his downfalls in the two routes of your choosing.
don't worry i'm not blaming you or anything from what i've gathered your doing a great job with your game i'm just gonna wait until it's fully fleshed out for a better experience! gl for the game until then!
My victory points are at 100 against the barbarians. How am I supposed to conquer them? Is it not implemented yet? Also how to increase prosperity after finishing village reconstruction?
People before me have already described their complaints in sufficient detail, and I would just like to express my support to them. I was terribly annoyed by our inability to decapitate the duke, but that's not the worst. DAMN BARBARIANS, THAT'S WHAT REALLY PISSED ME OFF. These parasites are attacking my land, ravaging my possessions, robbing, killing and raping, and instead of scorched earth and total genocide in the best traditions of colonialism, we are going to participate in their rituals and take over the trust that nobody needs? A couple of lines of text are enough for me, where it says how my army killed them all! After that, you can lock down the region until further updates, where we develop it under the noble flag of the queen.
The Duke is the first forgin event, and the game mechanics treat it like a tutorial for making choices in Forgin policy. That is until the game rug pulls your choice.
CK3? I assume you mean Crusader Kings 3? Frist of all CK mechanics are an approximation of feudal society not 100% accurate, which means other games that have different mechanics like an RPG maker game would be more historiclly accurate by not doing what CK3 does. CK3 doesn't have Nobles rebelling for stupid pervy reasons. This game establishes nothing about a "Duke faction", all he should have is his knights under his duchy. You think they want to fight so the Duke can perv? CK3 doesn't have a scenarios like this. The game establishes nothing that would legitimate the Dukes rebellion, or that he has a faction beyond his own personal knights. The Queen's other lords should be opportunistic and lining up to take his position for such stupidity.
Removing a rebellious noble is not Cusing tyranny without extra contexts. If he rebeled because the Queen wanted a ridiculous tax rate from him and the other lords. Sure tyranny is a good metric. If the Queen was supposed to offer protection from bandits or forginers, and the crown was too weak to help, and she imprison him or his family when the Queen failed in her duty. Then yes causing tyranny would be a good Metric.
The Duke has no allies, only subordinates. Even if the Duke did have allies what is he going to promis them? All he wants is to perv on the queen... what are his allies getting in return for RISKING TREASON???!!!!
If you don't go along with the Duke he immediately and unapologetically starts scheming rebellion. He is a rebellious treasonous vassle, and your reputation would be hurt way more by not severly punishing him. As for Tyrrany.... what is Tyrranical or unreasonable about the Queen wanting the Duke to simply do his duty during a time of war during a barbarian invasion? Earning Tyranny points implies the Queen was unreasonable at any point in the professional relationship.
Your Hypothetical "The Duke can rebel because lords in real life did it from time to time" excuse doesn't take into account that a real life lord would have a demand like Marriage or some other big ticket item for his whole faction. If the Duke wanted a marriage to get an advantage over the Queens other lords, then withholding some support could make some sence. But it also Wouldn't be done during an invasion by an enemy power like the barbarians. Would be counter offered with larger demands for the whole "Duke faction"... Even in the event of an actual treasonous rebellion In real life once the Queen won the consequences would be obvious and swift. His head would be place on a spike and he would be drawn and quartered. With his body parts sent to different regions to set an example of him.
This argument is so flawed.
Pro duke argument:
Lords in real life withheld support and rebeled for reasons that made sence in the power politics of the time.
Therefore the Duke can do it for the flimsiest stupidest reasons at the worst possible time considering the barbarian threat and the Queen wrong for doing something about it and teaching him the fuck around and find out lesson of life. SMH.
Ave... True to Ceasar!!! Put the proflogates on crosses.
I believe I have been offering constructive criticism to BrokenTorpedo. He has a great foundation to his game, its actually shaping up to be good enough to be a non porn game.
In defense of the barbarian story its made clear that Hawk tribe was not your enemy, its Stag and wolf tribe that is your enemies. So an alliance with them isnt bad writing. But you should be able to buy their trust with gold, rather than being a whore.
Also in defense of the Barbarian story BT is still not done with it like the Duke, it's still a legit WIP. The barbarian are a full campaign with attachs and counter attacks. Fortresses to attack and defend.
But yeah having an update where you turn down the alliance but can still move in to the second stage of the campaign as war criminal Queen would be a much needed balance of priorities.
I don't believe the dev need to get rid of anything he has done... he just needs to give the choices equal updates and balance the sub content with dom content.
But also... 100% we should be able to war crimes our way through the barbarians...
AVE!!!! TRUE TO CEASAR!!!!
Last edited:
You have two options. The first is to accept the alliance's offer and act like a dumb whore to gain their trust. The second is to decline the offer but go the long way and still form an alliance and be a dumb whore. Choose the "choice" that you like.
They are all part of the same tribal alliance, so they have a collective responsibility. I am not against the alliance, but I should be given appropriate compensation and due respect. Who finally crawled in to ask for help? Why should we gain trust? It's absurd! Who would benefit the most if the other two tribes were defeated? Who can guarantee that they won't attack again in the future? It's better to kill them all or colonize them and slowly assimilate them. Although the first one is more hopeful
AVE TRUE TO CEASAR!