Awwgasm

Newbie
Mar 9, 2020
31
55
Or remembered high school bio, or consulted wikipedia. :)
View attachment 3125866
25% probability of producing homozygous zygotes is not the same as 25% chance of being retarded. You probably know that, which is why you left out the last word of the paragraph in your screenshot, just couldn't help but try to argue in bad faith.

> which can when these alleles are deleterious.

This means that if you do not possess deleterious alleles, then you simply do not get congenital birth defects despite having recessive alleles outside of mutations (extremely simplified). There is also the case where even when inheriting said alleles the effects do not show and the offspring simply becomes a carrier.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GrandPaBrowning

GrandPaBrowning

Active Member
Mar 7, 2021
751
828
25% probability of producing homozygous zygotes is not the same as 25% chance of being retarded. You probably know that, which is why you left out the last word of the paragraph in your screenshot, just couldn't help but try to argue in bad faith.

> which can when these alleles are deleterious.

This means that if you do not possess deleterious alleles, then you simply do not get congenital birth defects despite having recessive alleles outside of mutations (extremely simplified). There is also the case where even when inheriting said alleles the effects do not show and the offspring simply becomes a carrier.
I will add my five cents here:

Humanity was going through incest throughout its history. Very often our ancestors lived in relatively closed small communities with differing degree of inbreeding. And only in extreme cases of multi-generational incest with already limited gene-pool, like with some royal bloodlines, inbreeding led to steady supply of malformities. Other than that - yes, in most likelihood YOUR genes too is on some level the result of cousin-humping.

Deal with it, I guess? Or maybe you find this idea totally hot, given the site you are in, hehe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scurvy

e6mill

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2022
1,565
3,047
25% probability of producing homozygous zygotes is not the same as 25% chance of being retarded. You probably know that, which is why you left out the last word of the paragraph in your screenshot, just couldn't help but try to argue in bad faith.
Because it wasn't relevant to my point which is that whoever said 25% didn't just pull that number out of their ass. But thank you for your rudeness.
 

jsmitth529

Member
Mar 4, 2020
194
373
I will throw in the small fact that first generational incest has less of a chance of any birth defects than any person of a large variety of disabilities having children does, yet those people are still allowed to have as many children as they want and take that chance. The reason societies are against incest is not because of that risk, as it isn't significant enough to warrant that, it's always some other moral stance. The fact that the player character in this game is a magical fucking dragon does also completely invalidate any genetic risk, so that argument is entirely nullified. Also it's a porn game so it doesn't matter.
 

don!edark0

Member
Feb 1, 2020
121
59
I will throw in the small fact that first generational incest has less of a chance of any birth defects than any person of a large variety of disabilities having children does, yet those people are still allowed to have as many children as they want and take that chance. The reason societies are against incest is not because of that risk, as it isn't significant enough to warrant that, it's always some other moral stance. The fact that the player character in this game is a magical fucking dragon does also completely invalidate any genetic risk, so that argument is entirely nullified. Also it's a porn game so it doesn't matter.
Sooooo does that mean Ill be able to knock up the dragons daughter in the next update or not?
 

GrandPaBrowning

Active Member
Mar 7, 2021
751
828
I will throw in the small fact that first generational incest has less of a chance of any birth defects than any person of a large variety of disabilities having children does, yet those people are still allowed to have as many children as they want and take that chance. The reason societies are against incest is not because of that risk, as it isn't significant enough to warrant that, it's always some other moral stance. The fact that the player character in this game is a magical fucking dragon does also completely invalidate any genetic risk, so that argument is entirely nullified. Also it's a porn game so it doesn't matter.
I'd say, your Bad Dragon isn't an argument pro-incest. But your darling widwe baby gurl Malice is. Because she is even more cosmic of a being than you are, and is clearly capable of doing some shenaganigans (ha, see what I did here?) with minds and bodies of people she comes in contact with.

So, yeah, try to give a congenital defects to a child of a gal who can juggle her DNA like she is some teen trying to impress her dad. Ooops! She kinda is!
 
4.50 star(s) 206 Votes