Decathect
Member
- Oct 18, 2017
- 131
- 906
That's what he meant?
I think i threw up in my mouth a little...
I think i threw up in my mouth a little...
Someone you hate into straightWhat's more exciting than turning someone you hate into gay?, kill isnt enough and never enough with someone turning your gf into whore even humiliate... So i think sometime we dont need kill 'cause the most logical workaround is probably doing the opposite of them....
I think the point for him is to break the regent.Someone you hate into straight?
Kinkshaming on a game like this? Kind of weird my guy, not gonna lie, and pretty unnecessary.That's what he meant?
I think i threw up in my mouth a little...
Right, we shouldnt judge that much.Kinkshaming on a game like this? Kind of weird my guy, not gonna lie, and pretty unnecessary.
I also found it pretty easy to understand the initial comment, broken English or not, but I guess that's just experience.
Would still work with permanent magical genderbending but considering that the game already has 2 male partners that seems even less likely to be added.I think the point for him is to break the regent.
As a player, I accept the developers' decisions, even if I don't agree with them. (See The goblin cave poor controllability.)Would still work with permanent magical genderbending but considering that the game already has 2 male partners that seems even less likely to be added.
I want to cuck Balthorne by raping everyone he loves. But biting his dick off at the start is immensely satisfying as well. Whoever had that idea, Chapeau to you! lolAs a player, I accept the developers' decisions, even if I don't agree with them. (See The goblin cave poor controllability.)
I would like to be a good dragon and build a rich and prosperous kingdom where people are happy. Then I would show this to the regent. "You see, I am a better leader than you were."
For me, this would be a worthy revenge. It may not be appropriate for a porn game, but I'm more interested in the story than the sex scenes.
As I wrote, this game has huge potential, there is something for everyone.I want to cuck Balthorne by raping everyone he loves. But biting his dick off at the start is immensely satisfying as well. Whoever had that idea, Chapeau to you! lol
If he dosnt im sure there is a way to fuck whatever metaphysical concept he might like.As I wrote, this game has huge potential, there is something for everyone.
Is there someone Balthorne love, outside of himself?
I hope. I meant if Balthorne only loves himself, and you want to rape everyone he loves, then you have to fuck him. But if he likes power, you have to take it away from him. (English isn't my first language, sorry.)If he dosnt im sure there is a way to fuck whatever metaphysical concept he might like.
Reign in your high horse for a tick.Kinkshaming on a game like this? Kind of weird my guy, not gonna lie, and pretty unnecessary.
What i expressed was disbelief towards the idea that a forced invasive body procedure, followed by repeated rape and life of imprisonment, represents his "law of peace" and holds a strict moral highground over killing.its just an idea... as a solution. the law of peace instead of killing...
...An admittedly weird flex, but good on you.I also found it pretty easy to understand the initial comment, broken English or not, but I guess that's just experience.
The writers are to be commended for creating such a well-done negative character. (Like Joffrey from Game of Thrones.)After reading the last posts I'm starting to feel bad for Balthorne... people want his ass sexually and metaphorically.
AgreeAs a player, I accept the developers' decisions, even if I don't agree with them. (See The goblin cave poor controllability.)
I would like to be a good dragon and build a rich and prosperous kingdom where people are happy. Then I would show this to the regent. "You see, I am a better leader than you were."
For me, this would be a worthy revenge. It may not be appropriate for a porn game, but I'm more interested in the story than the sex scenes.
First sentence: Ok, to begin with? How does that even make sense in this context? It implies that capital punishment is not, in fact, an effective deterrent - unlike the invasive body procedure, rape and perpetual imprisonment you advocated - since your argument clearly excludes the notion that the threat of death is enough to prevent...whatever figurative and unspecified situation avoids killing others by way of example. In your scenario everyone is all: "pff...death sentence? How droll. Lets keep going, lads!". That is exactly how absurd your pro-rape/incarceration/invasive procedure argument sounds.If doing this to one person avoids killing a hundred or a thousand or ten thousand others by way of example, there are definitely moral systems that consider this position the high ground. Most of the practical ones I'd say, even, however distasteful you may find them. Law enforcement has never been about rainbows and butterflies.
True. Re-reading the comments in sequence, I can see i wasnt nearly clear enough in expressing myself the way i meant to.your 'point' only ever existed in your head until the above message.
Not reading kinkshaming into that would be extending you not a branch, not even a log, but a multi-mile bridge.
You don't want to be misinterpreted, don't make vague remarks.