Jman9
Engaged Member
- Jul 17, 2019
- 2,295
- 966
- 172
I'll assume 'do' was supposed to be 'go'.The way you phrase it implies that letting him do would be the "less bad" option. If that's the case, I'd suggest re-reading my post, and explaining how letting a temperamental dickhead (who locks up/kills anyone who could be a threat to his power or doesn't succeed to his orders) on the throne would be a "good"/"less bad" choice.
Honestly, letting him go aka exile is a historically proven solution. In fact, exile was the worst punishment in certain societies.
But if you want to make sure that decision doesn't bite you in the ass at some point, there are other options. Make him a figurehead behaving on pain of exile/trial/dragon bite/body horror/whatever level of escalation you're okay with. Makes for a convenient scapegoat sooner or later, too. 'Forget' him in a dungeon cell. A nice one, even. Send him off on an atonement mission. I'm sure you can come up with more.
The overall sentiment I got from up-thread was "fuck him up, now!" There are lots of (probably better) choices in-between. Purging the previous ruler in what looks like a feudal society (and the dragon also has powerful underlings/allies who are going to take note of how he treats challenges to his rule) is not going to make his rule more stable, rather the converse.
My point was and is that what he 'deserves' and what's actually a 'good' choice are not necessarily even in the same building.
Edit:
This is the exact kind of social myopia that makes the dragon a 'bad' ruler, no matter his original intentions.Well it's mainly a matter of perspective. Specifically, your dragon's.
There's only two characters that actually pose a threat for him.
Last edited: