yes but why ruin the psyche of that woman who voluntarily gave herself over to Stan's power even after he freed her from the shackles of blackmail?
Stan is anyone but a mindless maniac.
Guys, why are you still drawn to breaking the role-playing? This is a fairly logically integral work. Yes, rich in fetishes, but this is a logically constructed work, where things happen logically. What is Stan's reason for breaking Emma's psyche? Maybe Emma did something contrary to her master's words?
First, answer this question clearly and then we can discuss this topic.
But for now - for now, this is all illogical nonsense. Besides, forcing Emma to have sex with Alex contradicts Stan's doctrine "you can look - you can't touch!". Emma is Stan's property, property that he is not going to allow anyone to touch.
Stan is, in fact, a maniac. Maybe not a brainless one but he's a monumental, manipulative asshole.
Why would be do that? Perhaps to completely solidify that he's Emma's owner. By making her cross a line that could quite literally put Emma in jail if anybody found out.
But at the same time, break Alex because small part of Stan's "grand plan" is to get back at Alex.
What better way to show it by exposing him and his mother fucking.
Then perhaps ordering Emma to fuck her own son. Her being reluctant and then submitting to it. Preferably a one off scene where it happens but Alex isn't allowed to do anything else further. Which is good because he's a terrible character.
Which then creates animosity between Alex and MC further. Giving a form of a conflict between two that MC easily overcomes.
Have we been playing the same game? Because this game goes through a same cycle over several updates
"Woman, you will do X"
"I dont want do X"
"I will force or emotionally manipulate you to do it"
"Ok, I will do it"
That's pretty much majority of chapters in this game.
I do agree that it does in fact go against the "it's my property" part but I see that kind of a scene using Alex more like a tool rather than sharing Emma in good faith.