Asses are evolutionary superior to titties, the science is settled on this point. It's a most rigorously researched topic in academia, multiple peer-reviewed studies. I won't be providing any of them though, just trust me.
Have u not read this thread? No compromises, middle road is for losers. Decide now: glorious asses or debased milk-bags!
I have seen that statement from anthropological sources. The idea that cleavage is reminiscent of buttocks.
The problem with these arguments for ass is that they assume the present is the past as well as being an appeal to an external authority without listing the value or shortcomings of either while completely ignoring the existence of pussy or a pretty face. In other words, barely arguments at all, just rhetoric.
Well, we do have the paleolithic "Venus" figures. Emphasis on buttocks and breasts in most of them, with little effort put into face or in some cases, genitals. Reminds me how in some cultures, a woman with wide hips and especially one that has proved she can bear children, were prized above young virgin waifs.
I'm not sure where you live, but I don't see many women walking around with their pussy lips flapping in the wind on a daily basis around here so it's hard to use that as an initial attraction thing. Faces are generally the second or third thing a guy notices about a girl. If she's facing you it's tits, then face, if she's facing away it's ass then face. If it's a side profile it's either ass or tits depending on your preference, then face.
Historically, the elites of a society have almost always been the most "degenerate."
Who started a debate? Didn't you make it a dichotomy?
