- Sep 24, 2017
- 389
- 275
Yeah, it's kinda dumb, I hope in a later version they change it to make more sense. Also dominance by itself isn't inherently immoral, but I would say in this case it is since you're literally enslaving someone.That's what I call broken; when she was bound, I didn't ask whether she was comfortable with my ideology. I don't see why morality would be a condition at all, much less the implication that dominance is inherently immoral.
If she were bound as the text stated, why would she be making any demands of Fracis at all? Does she deserve it?