I don't mind harem endings as long as Annie isn't part of it.
I don't understand. The game, actually Both games, are about Sara & her dad. If the story was about anyone else, it wouldn't be named "Sara." That's like watching "I Love Lucy" but you want the story to be about Ethel. That makes no sense.
That's how I like erotic games too, a few possible love targets, and you choose which one the MC will be sexually involved with until that female character path ending. But in games like "Oh Daddy - Sara" or "Lewd Island" where the main couple are clearly defined from the beginning, it makes sense that the main couple should be the focus of the entire game, side characters would have little content, and the game would end in a specific situation involving only the main couple, as a result of your choices.
You filthy pervert! Only a dirty pervert doesn't want to have a harem of ALL the girls hanging around. I should have hit you on the forehead with a big spoon to knock such dirty ideas out of your nasty head!
Better than nothing but when done right (eg don't put your dick back inside right after cumming) it's supposedly 85% effective. To be sure not effective enough to ruin a perfectly good orgasm over and will certainly fail if relied on alone for the long term. These days rather than pullout it's prob best to just keep a few Plan B's and abortion pills in the medicine cabinet aside from the usual birth control. Can't afford the $50 each for those or a kid = don't fuck. But yeah like condoms pulling out should never happen in porn, it's the opposite of a turn-on (the main point of porn). Only excuse for it even in the 1970's-1980's was that it was widely believed to just look better for the camera (it's annoying imo).
Kayla seems like just a side character added as an antagonist. But yeah very few AVNs exist (few completed that I know of and those were so long ago I forgot the names of them) where every LI is optional and it's possible to end up with an MC that stays a virgin the whole run. Not sure why that's still the case after 10 years but I'm guessing most devs assume that their target audience wants at least one of the LI's or the main one the AVN is about and don't feel like putting the extra effort of making "no one" an option. For this one probably just making Sara a normal daughter and not a lover too is a choice most people wouldn't choose anyway after the fucking she's already taken from daddy during the prequel and was deemed too much extra work for the relatively few that would choose that. I mean it's like playing an incest-based AVN and not wanting to fuck your family. Usually when that's an option you then have people complain about it being too short with not enough sex (because all the incest scenes were skipped or written around with alt choices without alt sex scenes to fill in the holes created).
It would make sense if the dev got rid of all dialogue choices and just made it to a kinetic novel, but the dev decided to add dialogue choices as if the player has a choice. For example, there is a scene where the MC can tell the truth or lie to Sara about being with Kayla. Also the MC has a choice to bring Kayla along or not to investigation as if choosing to bring her will keep u on her path or ending. Dialogue choices are present, but so far it doesn't seem to affect anything and the MC just fucks anything that moves. Illusion of choice. In other words fake choices. I do understand the game is called "Sara", but I have seen games like "Life with Mary", "Lucie", "Melody", and "Daughter for Dessert" where the MC can have endings with other LI's. I was just hoping this game will be similar given the dialogue choices...
You get a little more backstory, but if you read what it is saying on the OP you get the gist of it so it's not really mandatory to play first.
Not really.
