So do I. You're acting like you are the only ones that matter here. Because you don't have a problem with balls, other people can't have a problem with it. It's a fact that lots of people find them a turn off. You have a preference but is fine with them, good for you but not me, especially when they are no different from trans appearance wise when they do have balls.
Um, no. You're the one acting like you're the only one who matters. If you had just said, Gee, I wish there were more tags so I could filter out the stuff I don't like, I'd agree with you.
But no. You come in making claims, arguing about the importance of 'correct anatomy' for futanari, citing actual hermaphroditism and genital development--for a fantastical fetish. NO futanari in hentai works the way actual hermaphroditism does--what the word 'futanari' actually originally referred to. (Which included those who most would consider men, what with their beards and lack of breasts and everything, which hasn't shown up in any hentai
I've ever come across.) You bring up the technical original Japanese definition and how Japan has a different term for full-package futanari (without bringing up with the term IS, I'm not finding anything). I'm gonna go ahead and guess that the word 'futanari' is still in there and they added an adjective.
You say that ALL Japanese futanari art from the 90s and 2000s was one way because they RESPECTED the 'original' meaning and that it was the West that destroyed the purity of the meaning. Then, with very basic research that took me 30 seconds, I illustrate how, yes, actually, 'full-package' futanari existed in Japan (
Hot Tails, 1993-1994)
long before you claimed the West ruined futanari by inventing 'full-package'. You kind of just ignore that when you post a link to a site that happens to have some hentai on it (all of which is paywalled, in Japanese, and shows nothing in the previews) saying that because all the oldest stuff
there doesn't have full-package futas, it thereby proves your entire argument--despite the fact the oldest are only from 1999, many years after
Hot Tails. Which again, maybe
Hot Tails WAS somehow literally the only full-package futanari hentai that Japan ever created before Americans came back and 'ruined' everything, but that kind of seems unlikely to me.
You're the one complaining that futanari can only possibly mean this exact combination and that literally anything else is trans. You complain that so many of the games on here are vagina-less (which I also don't like) and claim that it's because they're all trans (Which seems to include futas who were born with balls AND vaginas), and that American porn ruined it all. I make a "to be fair, it's probably" argument, you completely dismiss it with no proof and then contradict yourself in the next sentence (the bit about 'of course there are proper models! And if there aren't they need to make them!' When well dur, maybe these artists use these pre-existing models because THEY DON'T KNOW HOW TO MAKE THEIR OWN MODELS. NOTICE HOW ALL THE 3D GAMES ON HERE USE DAZ OR HONEY SELECT?)
tl;dr
"Gee, I wish there were better tags for content involving feminine-looking individuals with male bits" would have gotten a "Yeah, me too!" from me.
You went with dissertations with bad and contradictory 'evidence' and completely dismissed any reasonable argument, which gets a "OH BROTHER, HERE WE GO..." from me.
