Got it , thanks for clearing it up. Really enjoyed your game!
Unlocked when you meet her, or when you "meat" her?
Scooter_Tramp
Member
- Dec 23, 2022
- 437
- 940
- 227
- Jan 16, 2025
- 150
- 1,678
- 152
.02 should end in Cedar Grove the morning after taking Nettie out for a drink.
.03 ends after your conversation with Alysha in Springhaven, just before leaving for Lakeshore.
Scooter_Tramp
Member
- Dec 23, 2022
- 437
- 940
- 227
- Jan 16, 2025
- 150
- 1,678
- 152
That's the end of the v.03 update. No idea how you ended there on v.02
TonyMurray
Conversation Conqueror
- Apr 8, 2024
- 6,557
- 12,449
- 774
Currently about six weeks between updates, but there are only two updates after the initial release to base that on, so it's quite possible that it might change (especially as pathing gets more complex and more scenes need multiple variants).
- Jan 16, 2025
- 150
- 1,678
- 152
The next update's gonna take a bit longer.
I was out of the country for a couple of weeks with work just after the last update, so I was already behind before I'd even started.
There's also a lot going on in v.04, with different locations, story progression, and as TonyMurray pointed out above, pathing complexity, variant renders, etc..
Just know - I'm working hard on it.
Progress:
Oakhill - Complete
Cedar Grove - 85%
Lakeshore - 0%
Springhaven - 0% (May not add content here to v.04. Might leave it for v.05)
977 Renders
38 Animations
5 Replay Scenes (Nettie, Violet, Millie x3)
Updated the replay gallery.
Added a photo gallery (in-game only)
Added a custom preferences screen
I was out of the country for a couple of weeks with work just after the last update, so I was already behind before I'd even started.
There's also a lot going on in v.04, with different locations, story progression, and as TonyMurray pointed out above, pathing complexity, variant renders, etc..
Just know - I'm working hard on it.
Progress:
Oakhill - Complete
Cedar Grove - 85%
Lakeshore - 0%
Springhaven - 0% (May not add content here to v.04. Might leave it for v.05)
977 Renders
38 Animations
5 Replay Scenes (Nettie, Violet, Millie x3)
Updated the replay gallery.
Added a photo gallery (in-game only)
Added a custom preferences screen
The next update's gonna take a bit longer.
I was out of the country for a couple of weeks with work just after the last update, so I was already behind before I'd even started.
There's also a lot going on in v.04, with different locations, story progression, and as TonyMurray pointed out above, pathing complexity, variant renders, etc..
Just know - I'm working hard on it.
Progress:
Oakhill - Complete
Cedar Grove - 85%
Lakeshore - 0%
Springhaven - 0% (May not add content here to v.04. Might leave it for v.05)
977 Renders
38 Animations
5 Replay Scenes (Nettie, Violet, Millie x3)
Updated the replay gallery.
Added a photo gallery (in-game only)
Added a custom preferences screen
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
It seems, I always miss a girl at Lakeshore...the gallery shows a free spot in the middle. Any suggestions, how I can meet her? I already played the game 5 times or more with different choices, but she is still not there....
TonyMurray
Conversation Conqueror
- Apr 8, 2024
- 6,557
- 12,449
- 774
some lesbian scene?The next update's gonna take a bit longer.
I was out of the country for a couple of weeks with work just after the last update, so I was already behind before I'd even started.
There's also a lot going on in v.04, with different locations, story progression, and as TonyMurray pointed out above, pathing complexity, variant renders, etc..
Just know - I'm working hard on it.
Progress:
Oakhill - Complete
Cedar Grove - 85%
Lakeshore - 0%
Springhaven - 0% (May not add content here to v.04. Might leave it for v.05)
977 Renders
38 Animations
5 Replay Scenes (Nettie, Violet, Millie x3)
Updated the replay gallery.
Added a photo gallery (in-game only)
Added a custom preferences screen
- Jan 16, 2025
- 150
- 1,678
- 152
Every time, huh? Maybe I should add a note to the bottom of my progress reports to save you from asking.
No, there won't be any lesbian scenes in the next update. There is... kinda... a little group scene, but no girl-on-girl action.
by now you know me haha I speak on behalf of all the lesbophiles here, I'm not the only one xD even if there isn't any content that I love most, I love you all the same hahaEvery time, huh? Maybe I should add a note to the bottom of my progress reports to save you from asking.
No, there won't be any lesbian scenes in the next update. There is... kinda... a little group scene, but no girl-on-girl action.
So first off, I wanted to say that I love the renders, the models, and the level of detail in each scene. Creating multiple renders to show characters actually moving through the space and interacting - rather than relying on just a few static shots - must take a tremendous amount of work I'm sure. But it really pays off. Honestly, it’s some of the best visual storytelling I’ve seen in a VN, even if I have limited experience with them at this point.
That said, I wanted to critique one thing. I love the walkthrough option, but having played without it the first time around I have to say I think the current approach to how "LI" determinations are made isn't very understandable. I'll give Cara as an example:
If you grab her butt right off the bat, you get an immediate negative reaction. Makes sense. Sneaking a glance of her butt in the following scene? Also a negative according to the walkthrough. Yet not much later deliberately looking down her top - while she actively notices - is a positive. What constitutes positive and negative actions feels a bit random when compared side by side.
Later in the story, you can look down her top while teaching her pool. First reaction is playful. Second is more negative. This would imply the third would be an even more negative reaction, meaning without the walkthrough you'd likely avoid doing it. Yet it ends up being a positive and the primary catalyst of the subsequent LI interactions.
Without foreknowledge of right and wrong choices, currently it feels rather difficult to know which actions are the correct ones to take and which should be avoided. It seems like it'd be better to have a less restrictive game design that isn't a good or bad choice system (skip a, skip b, choose c, d, and e) but rather more of a tally system (no or limited "good" or "bad" actions, most/all rather being counted towards a minimum threshold that marks them as a LI, but engaging in too many too fast turns the LI off of the MC) would be more intuitive and less needing of a walkthrough to complete successfully.
So taking the above example, it'd be something like showing interest in a limited number of the earlier scenes, but avoiding engaging in too many opportunities and thus coming across as overly creepy, combined with completing one or two of the pool scene glances would trigger a separate render back at the house asking if the MC "really wants to see them" as a secondary route alongside the current existing one, preventing players from missing that branch of the story entirely just because they misread the implication of the pool scene as being the "bad" choice.
That was probably overly wordy and not entirely clear, but I hope I conveyed the general idea. Just my 2 cents.
That said, I wanted to critique one thing. I love the walkthrough option, but having played without it the first time around I have to say I think the current approach to how "LI" determinations are made isn't very understandable. I'll give Cara as an example:
If you grab her butt right off the bat, you get an immediate negative reaction. Makes sense. Sneaking a glance of her butt in the following scene? Also a negative according to the walkthrough. Yet not much later deliberately looking down her top - while she actively notices - is a positive. What constitutes positive and negative actions feels a bit random when compared side by side.
Later in the story, you can look down her top while teaching her pool. First reaction is playful. Second is more negative. This would imply the third would be an even more negative reaction, meaning without the walkthrough you'd likely avoid doing it. Yet it ends up being a positive and the primary catalyst of the subsequent LI interactions.
Without foreknowledge of right and wrong choices, currently it feels rather difficult to know which actions are the correct ones to take and which should be avoided. It seems like it'd be better to have a less restrictive game design that isn't a good or bad choice system (skip a, skip b, choose c, d, and e) but rather more of a tally system (no or limited "good" or "bad" actions, most/all rather being counted towards a minimum threshold that marks them as a LI, but engaging in too many too fast turns the LI off of the MC) would be more intuitive and less needing of a walkthrough to complete successfully.
So taking the above example, it'd be something like showing interest in a limited number of the earlier scenes, but avoiding engaging in too many opportunities and thus coming across as overly creepy, combined with completing one or two of the pool scene glances would trigger a separate render back at the house asking if the MC "really wants to see them" as a secondary route alongside the current existing one, preventing players from missing that branch of the story entirely just because they misread the implication of the pool scene as being the "bad" choice.
That was probably overly wordy and not entirely clear, but I hope I conveyed the general idea. Just my 2 cents.
Last edited:
I don't know why my post will not be shown, the way I create it...but here I try again....it's the answer to Jimmy1984
Uh, I got it. THere was a bracked missing after "SPOILER"...now it should be ok
Uh, I got it. THere was a bracked missing after "SPOILER"...now it should be ok
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content.
Log in or register now.
louisamay
Member
- Jan 2, 2021
- 120
- 345
- 184
Oh dear, it has been almost 2 whole months since your last update! I jest. You, badbody, have been such a forerunner in my list of amazing AVN's. I do love how your stories flow, with sexuality as a natural element, and character as a natural paradigm. Truly -- I love your work. If there is anything I can do to help you, I am there. x Louisa May
ps -- holy hell, you are the Bomb in girls' sex blush. Ah!
ps -- holy hell, you are the Bomb in girls' sex blush. Ah!
Last edited: