Probably not, Cla-Min shop doesn't work. But soon. Very soon.still cant access cla-min's store... is that problem from android port only?
No.Warg kennel eh? Is this going where I hope its going?
So no goblin cavalry riding their warwolves to harry my enemies? Not ever? DROPPED.
hope so. .Warg kennel eh? Is this going where I hope its going?
Wargs deserve some action too.Probably not, Cla-Min shop doesn't work. But soon. Very soon.
No.
Maybe I missed something, but aren't the driders basically feral? Thought you could get away with mythical beasts and "monsters".We aren't going to add bestiality to the game.
You could make a plot about a warg that ends up being a barghest (a goblin/worg lycanthrope)We cannot get away with Wargs. Driders are kinda sentient and also don't resemble actual animals.
No amount of begging will change that. Devs aren't interested in losing their plataforms (patreon and steam) for this.You could make a plot about a warg that ends up being a barghest (a goblin/worg lycanthrope)
Fair enough, will have to take a rain check on the driders though, I assume you meant sapient rather than sentient, but last time I played the behavior of the driders resembled that of a trained beast at best.We cannot get away with Wargs. Driders are kinda sentient and also don't resemble actual animals.
Being honest, this game is already playing around with a lot of content that could risk their platforms, I don't think it is "begging" to wonder if they couldn't skirt around this one too, specially since pretty much every individual taboo aspect of it is already separatedly done in other characters.No amount of begging will change that. Devs aren't interested in losing their plataforms (patreon and steam) for this.
Bestiality is forbbiden on patreon. Therefore there is no discussion to be had because it is not the devs drawing a line wherever they want. So don't insist for it won't happen.Being honest, this game is already playing around with a lot of content that could risk their platforms, I don't think it is "begging" to wonder if they couldn't skirt around this one too, specially since pretty much every individual taboo aspect of it is already separatedly done in other characters.
Is the issue the lack of sapience? Driders and maybe the tentacle creature got that covered. Is the issue the resemblance to features of real animals? Well hello wolf-daddy and Greyhide. Is the issue the context of potential abuse and lack of consent? Really don't think I need to exemplify that one in this game, do I?
I'm fine with the devs drawing the line wherever they want or they feel they need to, but I don't think it is fair to pretend there isn't a discussion to be had when the lines outlying the issue are already so shaky.
It is the devs drawing a line where they felt they needed to, which is fine, they either got more specific directives or some other reason to know risking adding sexual content with wargs would be a bad idea. I am not arguing against the decision of the devs. I am arguing against your supression of people discussing what content could be okay then. Bestiality is forbidden on patreon, but what IS the "forbidden bestiality", as opposed to what the game already has in the examples I mentioned?Bestiality is forbbiden on patreon. Therefore there is no discussion to be had because it is not the devs drawing a line wherever they want. So don't insist for it won't happen.
Basically if they cant consent and they look like an animal, its completely against the rules. Wild life-esque Bipedals are about as far as you can take it without crossing the line. Other devs manage to get away with worse but if they get reported enough, or get too popular, they will be taken down. The Devs could introduce bipedal werewolves, but they aren't really wargs nor would they really be in kennels, so it doesn't make sense for this case.Bestiality is forbidden on patreon, but what IS the "forbidden bestiality", as opposed to what the game already has in the examples I mentioned?