- Aug 28, 2017
- 366
- 517
Completely disagree. There isn't any type of verbal humiliation or masochist acts directed at her.
no they're not. cuckquean, much like cuckold often, more often than not, but still only often, include humiliation or masochism. but they are not the default.That is why i was disagreeing. The kink you were mentioaning involves thoses things,
i guess the confusion comes from the many terms that got invented and have very similar distinctions, yet are huge dealbreakers for those who are into those kinks.
for example is there cuckold and hotwife. one definition i've heard about them, is that the man of former wants to be denied by his wife, while she seeks out sex with other men and the man of the latter seeks out men who can have sex with his wife, while he still has sex with his wife and maybe even joins his wife's lover.
i've yet to find a term describing such a distinction for cuckquean. any constellation for a woman desiring to share her husband with other women get all put under the term cuckquean, so of course one might think the usual definitions for cuckold can be applied to cuckquean as well.
i for one am into cuckquean and i definitely don't like masochism at all. i'd rather call myself submissive (which by the way is also not a requirement for neither cuckquean nor cuckold) and humiliation is not my cup of tea.
i would rather argue that since X'zaratl is neither the partner of Rowan nor Alexia, the only way she could be in a cuckquean relationship with them, is for their bond they share. Rowan and Alexia love each other amids pain and suffering, and in spite of thousands of people they are indirectly dooming. X'zaratl as a demon never experienced such a bond herself and admires the existence of it. if you really want to scram this into the term cuckquean, then that she "gets off" on them deepening their bond.