- Dec 6, 2024
- 210
- 929
- 161
Thanks to you for clarifying the problem and solving it.
You must be registered to see the links
Thanks to you for clarifying the problem and solving it.
But what makes you the representative of the main audience to give the dev the best chance of success? You haven't even played the game.Platitudes are nice, but in a oversaturated market, why not give yourself the best chance of success with the main audience? How many have to fail in the same manner for people to understand that blindly 'follow your vision' means shoot yourself in the foot more often than not?
What a funny coincidence that every time cuck adjacent content happens there are only people like you that doesn't mind it, or fans of that genre that run defense. You never see a vanilla/romance fan saying "I hate it, but I want the dev to follow his vision". Very peculiar detail.But what makes you the representative of the main audience to give the dev the best chance of success? You haven't even played the game.
Just like blindly following their vision can mean shooting themselves in the foot, so can blindly following an individual player's preference. Simply put, the game is not made for that individual. Your preference is not more/less valid than someone else's.
If "knowing/assuming and actually seeing it" are two totally different things, then why are you here yelling that, regardless of whether the player sees the scene or not, they’ll be disgusted by the LI because this scenes exists?Knowing/Assuming and actually seeing it are two entirely different things, if you cannot understand a principle as simple as that(or my bet, you pretend you don't) then that stops in its tracks any discussion we can have on that subject.
It’s your bad faith that insults people’s intelligence. You describe "voyeurism" as nothing more than a way to make the player feel like a cuck, because if I follow your logic when you watch porn or play VN you are a cuck no? You're not the one who fuck the girls.Every time someone bends over backwards to explain the necessity of 'voyeurism' scenes for the plot tm, everyone know why they are there, but for whatever reason its always mental gymnastics and justifications, realism and immersion, insulting everyone's intelligence in the process.
Oh, I see now—the girl has to be perfect, a virgin with a body count of zero, and you have to be her hero who comes to save her, right?Bottom line, a vanilla/romance fan has no need to read details, or worse see them rendered and animated, about a Romantic Option's previous, or ongoing sex life. It's as simple as that, that type of info/scenes are designed for the armchair populace, which you claim you totally don't court![]()
At first, I thought you were here to give real constructive criticism, but I quickly realized you don’t actually care.What a funny coincidence that every time cuck adjacent content happens there are only people like you that doesn't mind it, or fans of that genre that run defense. You never see a vanilla/romance fan saying "I hate it, but I want the dev to follow his vision". Very peculiar detail.
What I posted is not an individual player's preference, its what I picked over the years from the largest fanbase on the site and the mountain of failed attempts to play both sides in the Abandoned aisle are my receipts.
He can do what he likes, I said my piece, his and now yours continuous attempts to gotcha me is what still keeps me in the thread.
Watching porn, or watching Randoms you never interact with is not the same thing like watching people you have emotional attachment with. Again you offer good examples of how to implement voyeurism, yet you use a LI from the game to do it, so the player sees what he lost, because that is why its there to get an emotional reaction from players. If we drill more I am sure you will finally learn this thing called transparency, instead of mental gymnastics of why people should be fine with it.It’s your bad faith that insults people’s intelligence. You describe "voyeurism" as nothing more than a way to make the player feel like a cuck, because if I follow your logic when you watch porn
He typed about my argument being in bad faith and this is his argumentor play VN you are a cuck no? You're not the one who fuck the girls.
Hello? I was the one that suggested the PDA in the first place. You see mr good faith argument how you are more preoccupied with trying to own me than actually engaging? Just call me an incel and be done with it, I know its comingYou’re the great messenger of vanilla/romance players (probably harem too?) who absolutely don’t want any LI to even place her hand on another man’s shoulder.
If you decided to go full redacted, you should have also mentioned my girthy, veiny reaction count.Because you, with your 4,000 forum posts, clearly know best
I find it really weird that you think it's a very peculiar detail that people who don't mind or fans of any genre (not even specifically about "cuck adjacent content") not complaining about that genre. Of course anyone would only complain about something if they hate it. That's just common sense.What a funny coincidence that every time cuck adjacent content happens there are only people like you that doesn't mind it, or fans of that genre that run defense. You never see a vanilla/romance fan saying "I hate it, but I want the dev to follow his vision". Very peculiar detail.
This is probably the most narcissistic post I've ever seen since 2017.What I posted is not an individual player's preference, its what I picked over the years from the largest fanbase on the site and the mountain of failed attempts to play both sides in the Abandoned aisle are my receipts.
I have zero interest in trying to gotcha you. I'm genuinely interested in trying to understand your reasoning behind your comment. I'm wondering how someone can be so insecure about optional content.He can do what he likes, I said my piece, his and now yours continuous attempts to gotcha me is what still keeps me in the thread.
Sorry, this is the most narcissistic post I've ever seen since 2017.If you decided to go full redacted, you should have also mentioned my girthy, veiny reaction count.Turns out quite a few people tend to agree with me.
What I claimed from the get go, target different audience, playing both sides. I just don't like the pretend we don't know why scenes are in the game and what are designed to do.Genuine question, what do you think the purpose of optional content is?
Autismo? You know what the kappa emoji is for, right?Sorry, this is the most narcissistic post I've ever seen since 2017.
ClearlyI have zero interest in trying to gotcha you.
And you didn’t realize I was literally using your own logic to make the comparison? Wow, I don’t even know what to say.He typed about my argument being in bad faith and this is his argument![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Anyway, one more try. Either you self insert like most people(name changing is like the #1 most asked feature in a VN, I wonder why) do, or try to roleplay as the MC, interactive stories are not like reading books, watching porn etc where you are a 3rd party just going with the flow, you make choices and experience the consequences of those choices. Again if you need to have explained a concept as simple as this, as a game dev, I don't know what to tell you...
I won’t say it outright, but your behavior comes very close to it. But it's okay, don’t worry—everything’s going to be just fine.Hello? I was the one that suggested the PDA in the first place. You see mr good faith argument how you are more preoccupied with trying to own me than actually engaging? Just call me an incel and be done with it, I know its comingThanks for the laugh, gotta love good old lack of self awareness.
I noticed that you like BaDIK, so in your opinion, when Maya and Josy have sex multiple times in the game, does that mean DrPinkCake is playing in both lanes, being disrespectful, and insulting the intelligence of others? Is that it?What I claimed from the get go, target different audience, playing both sides. I just don't like the pretend we don't know why scenes are in the game and what are designed to do.
There are zero posts of mine 'complaining' in open NTR/Hotwife games, I wonder why? Would it have anything to do with devs there being open about what their games are about and if I want to try it I know exactly what I get myself into? There is zero dance around tags and semantics in those games. Its always the guys that don't pick a lane that grate on me, because like I said, it insults everyone's intelligence and is disrespectful of peoples time.
I always find it interesting when someone chooses to dance around to avoid giving direct answer to a straight forward question. What is even the purpose of quoting the question lol?What I claimed from the get go, target different audience, playing both sides. I just don't like the pretend we don't know why scenes are in the game and what are designed to do.
There are zero posts of mine 'complaining' in open NTR/Hotwife games, I wonder why? Would it have anything to do with devs there being open about what their games are about and if I want to try it I know exactly what I get myself into? There is zero dance around tags and semantics in those games. Its always the guys that don't pick a lane that grate on me, because like I said, it insults everyone's intelligence and is disrespectful of peoples time.
My answer is right there in the quote, voyeurism with a game's romantic partner is designed to cause the same type of emotions like a NTR scene, the same type of people will love it and the same other type of people will hate it. Just because with the current tag(I'm not sure with the new one) system doesn't qualify, which getting a tag isn't even my point, doesn't change the fact that it has the same narrative reason to exist.I always find it interesting when someone chooses to dance around to avoid giving direct answer to a straight forward question. What is even the purpose of quoting the question lol?
All it comes down to is that you're interpreting and equating voyeurism as NTR. The inability to differentiate the two is something that is your own. Coupled with the inability to understand the purpose of optional content, then we end up with you. Someone who complains about something that they made up themselves. Sadly not the first person to do this, and sadly not going to be last one either.
This is the result when someone is not commenting about what is in the game, but about something that is in their mind.
I literally don't know who you do it, its 3/3 using the perfect example for me. Are you sure you are not trying to help me?I noticed that you like BaDIK, so in your opinion, when Maya and Josy have sex multiple times in the game, does that mean DrPinkCake is playing in both lanes, being disrespectful, and insulting the intelligence of others? Is that it?
Yet, it’s exactly the same situation I’m describing—one LI (two in BaDIK) having a lesbian scene with another girl.
And yet, in BaDIK, Maya and Josy can still be LIs that you haven’t rejected, depending on your choices.![]()
I honestly think you're either an idiot or you're doing this on purpose.Which M&J scene, the flashback that shows them kissing and then fades to black(see my first post, again, and maybe actually read it this time), or their scene in ep6 that is shown when the player is on the throuple route, the opposite of your game's case?![]()
And now you're making things up that I never said. Who ever said we gonna "read their thoughts comparing dick taste between clients" exactly?Anything that can be remotely considered unsavory is saved for tertiary characters/side fucks, non important character, nothing with the Main Girls, you know, your selling point for your game?
But since we are on the topic, I wonder how that game manages to have sex workers as fan-favorite characters for vanilla fans, maybe beacuse you don't have 'voyeurism' scenes with them, or find sex tapes, or photos, or read their thoughts comparing dick taste between clients, aka that dev doesn't rub it into players faces. Alien concept, I am telling you, a game designed for a vanilla audience not pissing in their faces and telling them its rain.![]()
Oh yeah, you’ll just move on to another developer, tell them their way of doing things is trash, that they’re "playing between the lanes,'"and that they should listen to Mr. 4000 Forum Posts instead.Now I am truly done, ignoring the thread, I at least had some laugh with peoples attempt to pick only the bits of text they thought will get me and completely ignoring everything else I posted, but now I regret if I made you waste too much time from rendering 'voyeurism' scenes.![]()
I’ll ask Maddison to fix that for the next update, sir.I forgot to mention my only "complaint" so far.
From the second sex scene with Maddison, she seems to have shaved off the little landing strip she wore in the first scene.
Unacceptable and unplayable.
Hypocrite, that’s just her way of saying she loves you.Also, I found it weird how Lena asks if she's a 'fling, roommate, or something else'. She should know that we're not romantically compatible after the conversation about her career ended with her calling me a hypocrite.![]()
I really didn't want to tell Lena about Mina, I don't think it's any of her business whether I'm on her path or not. But if I don't, I don't get to meet Ella.Hypocrite, that’s just her way of saying she loves you.
(No, but seriously, it means you talked to her about Mina, so you made up for it after the quiz)
I understand you, but don’t worry, she’s not going to disappear... She’ll come back later for you...I really didn't want to tell Lena about Mina, I don't think it's any of her business whether I'm on her path or not. But if I don't, I don't get to meet Ella.![]()
Honestly, I felt like my answers were reasonable. I don't want to act like an asshole towards her, but at the same time, I wouldn't want to date someone that posts provocative photos online for anyone to see.Hypocrite, that’s just her way of saying she loves you.
(No, but seriously, it means you talked to her about Mina, so you made up for it after the quiz)
I told her about Mina and still didn't meet anyone called Ella. Guess you also need to pass her little test as well for that.I really didn't want to tell Lena about Mina, I don't think it's any of her business whether I'm on her path or not. But if I don't, I don't get to meet Ella.![]()
I think this is a very misguided train of thought. The fundamental aspect is the "romantic partner". NTR clearly revolves around current romantic partner (i.e.: your gf or wife). On the other hand, voyeurism is not with the current romantic partner (i.e.: anyone who isn't your gf or wife). Considering that dev explained that the planned scene is with an LI that you rejected (i.e.: you have no romantic interest in her), then clearly it isn't NTR. While the act of watching is the same, the motive for voyeurism and NTR is very different. To claim that they are designed to cause the same type of emotion while having different motive makes no sense.My answer is right there in the quote, voyeurism with a game's romantic partner is designed to cause the same type of emotions like a NTR scene
Sorry I missed this post of yours before and this is actually a great post. The key point here is the emotional attachment. I agree with you that watching porn or randoms having sex give no emotional attachment. However, the difference between you and me is that I'm able to detach that emotion because I'm not pursuing that LI. I'm not pursuing an LI because I have no romantic interest in her character. Therefore, I don't have emotional attachment to her.Watching porn, or watching Randoms you never interact with is not the same thing like watching people you have emotional attachment with. Again you offer good examples of how to implement voyeurism, yet you use a LI from the game to do it, so the player sees what he lost, because that is why its there to get an emotional reaction from players.
M&J is a great example because them being lesbian/throuple is optional. So for those who are not into lesbian/throuple, they can choose to opt out. That doesn't mean that it's a "waste of time" to create that path. Similarly here, even if you really must consider voyeurism evoking the same emotional reaction out of you as NTR, you can choose to not engage in the voyeurism.Which M&J scene,
Lastly, I think it is massive exaggeration to claim that dev is playing both sides when the voyeurism is probably less than 1% of the game. You'd have more point if the game heavily focused on voyeurism, but it doesn't. For what it's worth, M&J's relationship is a much more prominent aspect in BADIK (because they are major characters that continue to stay with you throughout the whole game ) than the voyeurism in this game (which only exists if you specifically pursue it and non-existent otherwise). If you're able to accept BADIK having optional content, you should be able to accept this game having optional content too. It is hypocritical otherwise.What I claimed from the get go, target different audience, playing both sides.