- Apr 18, 2022
- 436
- 783
The one having hard understanding is you.Simple, what paths the Dev is going to give us and will there be a less asshole path. Asshole path is fine if there are other options but as of right now there aren't. Why this is hard for you to understand I have no idea. You want to be a complete asshole sadist in game, more power to you. I have nothing negative to say about you wanting your MC to be an asshole all the way, enjoy yourself. However I want to know from the dev if there is a lesser asshole path that they are planning on as a choice as well.
You seem to think I want the dev to turn the MC into a Disney cartoon Prince and that is just false.
1) I never stated nor alluded to what kind of personality or character you wanted to turn the MC into, don't argue strawmen
2) One path in a game is fine regardless whether it is a villain, hero or neutral path. Not all games need multiple paths, in fact juggling those can often lead to a worse game narratively.
3) Not only has it been clearly stated numerous times that once a girl's questline is over, her content is pretty much done. There also have never been any indication of other lesser "asshole" paths.
You had a problem with the MC taking advantage with his Lesbian friend, but you forget that they weren't friends to begin with. They just met at the start of the game. Sure he was nice and showed her around and that could have let to a friendship if he didn't have any alternative motive, but they were never friends before.
You had a problem with turning Bill, conveniently disregarding that you actually had the option to just have him forget about you. You literally had the non asshole option and still complained. Before you come back and say making him forget was also bad, remember that the MC is tricked into thinking it is necessary because Bill is a liability.
You had a problem with the family, but not only can you keep them relatively themselves, before you turn them there is literally a conversation with Ava where he hesitates.
4) You are still disregarding the problematic dissonance the change you are suggesting would create. On top of that you are also disregarding the very valid question why you are trying to fundamentally change something so it caters to you, rather than find something that already does. To me it is absolutely foolish to want big changes in something so established already. You might as well ask for less gun play in Call of Duty. It is fine suggesting changes and giving feedback, but don't try to change the very core of the game.
Lastly if you are going to reply to me, please address the points raised. It is getting rather annoying that you are talking around them, don't answer questions and misinterpreted what I am saying.