VN Ren'Py Single Again [v1.25.02] [Clever name games]

[Verbalvonitcomet]

I Guess I Weirded you guys out huh. BBBBWWAHHHAHAHA.

 

[cxx]

I Guess I Weirded you guys out huh. BBBBWWAHHHAHAHA.

nope.

 

[Verbalvonitcomet]

nope.

I wouldn't have expected you of all people to be phased by that statement... Your as warped and twisted as me.

 

[Joshy92]

Now I can't stop thinking about Lily & Becca.
Every time I think of this game my mind immediately goes there.

I tell you guys Becca & I would go to town on Lily's sexy petite body.
There would be kisses & licking and of course lots of sexy moans out of the girls.

And I would blast a big load in both of those hotties.

 

[Hese_1]

kissing or joshy exploding?

Why not both?

 

[cxx]

I wouldn't have expected you of all people to be phased by that statement... Your as warped and twisted as me.

maybe but my most weirds are just teasing joshy.

Why not both?

well for latter to happen 1st has to happen before 2nd.

 

[Hese_1]

well for latter to happen 1st has to happen before 2nd.

Well, yes but those does not need to happen at the same time

 

[cxx]

Well, yes but those does not need to happen at the same time

no but can happen if joshy is watching.

 

[RDFozz]

Well there still exist the options of sewing discord and shade on these various threads... To troll or not to troll that is the question. But even that gets old at times So I guess I'm stuck with Beverly Hillbillies reruns.

Well, now, don't forget you can always go down to the junction ...
...
...
Petticoat Junction

 

[BoosterGold74]

Not sure where you are from, but most courts here in the US have "no fault" divorce laws which means infidelity doesn't matter unless there are prenuptial agreements.

No-fault divorce allows a couple to divorce without blame or fault. It is often the simplest path to divorce available in a state. Originally, a married couple had to provide an acceptable reason for why they should be allowed to end their marriage and get a divorce. Cheating would be a major reason to get a divorce. This would not have been a No Fault situation anyway because there was no way she would have not forced him to take the blame.

 

[Cartageno]

No-fault divorce allows a couple to divorce without blame or fault. It is often the simplest path to divorce available in a state. Originally, a married couple had to provide an acceptable reason for why they should be allowed to end their marriage and get a divorce. Cheating would be a major reason to get a divorce. This would not have been a No Fault situation anyway because there was no way she would have not forced him to take the blame.

However, a lot of countries and quite a few US states which have "no fault" laws do not even talk about possible fault anymore at all, in other words, the question of infidelity will never be brought up or - if somebody talked about it - ignored.

 

[BoosterGold74]

However, a lot of countries and quite a few US states which have "no fault" laws do not even talk about possible fault anymore at all, in other words, the question of infidelity will never be brought up or - if somebody talked about it - ignored.

That is only true if both parties agree to the No fault. Not all divorces are no fault, this was just a way to get the courts to move faster on divorces that neither side was contesting. Still not relevant to these characters.

 

[girlfairdev]

Not all divorces are no fault, this was just a way to get the courts to move faster on divorces that neither side was contesting

Not the only reason a lot of people choose to use the no fault option. Often it is just the least expensive way to bail from a bad situation you mutually want out of.

 

[Elhemeer]

Points are being missed here. No-Fault can only happen if both parties agree to it. It's not a default-setting on divorce court. There's no way Shanut would agree to that, so it wouldn't be an option.

Also, they're in Canada, although if they have anything like that, it probably still needs the consent of both persons.

 

[MrLKX]

Earlier this year, I mentioned this: It is mostly about British Columbia, but it should still work.

2. adultery
A divorce for adultery has more hurdles than a separation. The difficult part is that you have to prove that the adultery occurred. While the court will not force you to identify the person involved with your spouse, you must base your allegations on clear factors that the court can substantiate.

The best way to obtain a divorce decree based on adultery claims is for your spouse to admit it in a sworn statement. Other methods, such as investigating for discovery and appearing in court, require a thorough consultation with your family law attorney before seeking a divorce decree on these grounds.

Pursuing a divorce on the grounds of adultery also requires that both parties swear that there was no collusion. In addition, the adultery must have taken place without the consent of the second spouse. The court will not consider the duration of the affair as long as there is reliable evidence of adultery.

Typically, courts will grant a divorce on the grounds of adultery if the affair involves an extramarital sexual relationship. Keep in mind that the BC Supreme Court does not allow extramarital sex in open marriages as a legal basis for divorce.

Regarding the part I highlighted in bold: I'm pretty sure Shannon had no problem acknowledging her guilt on the part of adultery.

 

[cxx]

well mc had best "lawyers" on his side so win was guaranteed.

 

[Verbalvonitcomet]

My First Wife was on the revolving Mattress plan. She screwed my brother while I was deployed. Hencs the math for my youngest Daughter didn't add up. When she came to me latter and said that She loved me but Wasn't in love with me, I knew right there I was screwed. She thought that she had me cause the DNA would be close enough. I'm glad that my brother had a guilt complex cause he came clean and told me everything. Otherwise I would have been on the hook for 15 years of child support. I got the best Lawyer I could muster Cordell and Cordell. They only handle men and it was worth every penny. I got custody she payed child support and my youngest daughter will never need to know her mothers infidelity.

 

[rudy007]

well mc had best "lawyers" on his side so win was guaranteed.

I think that little "intervention" from Becca and Lilith helped a lot even if it shouldn't. Judge said it didn't but I still believe it. Lilith's probably even more, she didn't want to help, but she was there. And judge saw that.

 

[MrLKX]

I think that little "intervention" from Becca and Lilith helped a lot even if it shouldn't. Judge said it didn't but I still believe it. Lilith's probably even more, she didn't want to help, but she was there. And judge saw that.

I think that thanks to their intervention, the judge will at least have kept a close eye on Shannon's games. Since Frank demonstrably earns less than Shannon, I think it was relatively clear that he would get the alimony. Shannon's attempt to screw Frank over (without evidence) and her daughters' forewarning (which the judge herself said was unusual) only made it more expensive for Shannon than it normally would have been.

On the subject of ripping Frank off, I have an excerpt there too, also from British Columbia, but it should still be good enough and give us some legal insight:

Mental or physical cruelty
Toxic marriages involving mental and physical cruelty are not tolerable in BC. The court will allow you to get out of these relationships by divorcing on the grounds of abuse. A divorce on grounds of cruelty will only be granted if the extent of the abuse makes continued cohabitation intolerable.

However, the courts will require you to provide any evidence that proves instances of cruelty. The court also requires that all cruelty claims be subjectively interpreted and free of inconsistencies. If you have enough evidence to prove physical or mental cruelty, the courts will likely grant you a divorce decree.

The BC Supreme Court and the family law system were set up to ensure no-fault divorce. As such, shallow allegations of cruelty and adultery are dismissed. The courts favor no-fault divorces as they are less emotionally charged and controversial and are ideal for maintaining co-parenting relationships.

Here I have highlighted the parts that are relevant to me. In bold is what Shannon and her lawyer tried to do, in italics is what Shannon's lawyer apparently forgot to inform Shannon about. In this respect, the judge actually acted within her legal rights, as she herself said. In addition, I think that the lady had already seen some amateur theater, Shannon's performance was not really convincing and the secret statements of her daughters in this regard were merely the final nail in the coffin for her accusations.

 

[BoosterGold74]

Not the only reason a lot of people choose to use the no fault option. Often it is just the least expensive way to bail from a bad situation you mutually want out of.

That means they decided not to contest anything. The whole root of the No fault is that no one is contesting anything and that it is quick and cheap. If one party wanted to be an ass about the whole thing then there is no chance for using the No fault. Shannon would not have been interested in a No fault because she's a complete bitch.