Wow! Thanks for the care.
Isn't it a little early for Christmas gifts?
It looks like there will either be, or there already is, an animated video file based on these images.
i could give two fucks whether or not you care about my opinion. i just shared my two cents.
it's really not that hard to pick up a pencil a practice drawing. you could develop your own skills and satisfy your cravings at the same time. using ai to generate pure soulless slop because they're too lazy and entitled to create it themselves is how you spit on what art is supposed to be, not to mention the amount of energy wasted to power ai machines. it's utterly pathetic how desperate some members here are for sleepygimp's content and the lengths they'll go to get it without actually paying for it. i don't pay for his content either, but i'm not this depraved about it. i take what i can get for free and that's the end of it. i would never have the audacity to demand anything from sleepygimp. how low of a level would you really stoop to all for the sake of a wank?
and for the record, i do think i have a right to call out people on their bullshit on this forum considering at least a few of y'all members are fkn pedos
Frankly, I don't even know what to think...
How did it happen that I brought content demonstrating that neural networks are no longer a generator of "plastic bastards",
And now they are able to create something really worthwhile, turned into mutual insults?
And why are you throwing your claims at us, the forum participants?
I think I've managed to understand your basic position on neural networks.:
It annoys you that the author spends 3-4 hours on the original image, being creative, and the user of neural networks, after a period of adjustment, can click on the button as much as he wants, getting "content" in 15 minutes.
Am I right? Is this the main claim?
Well, then you can approach Sleepy itself with such claims.
They say that a real artist, creator and author, should use: a palette, canvas, 2 dozen art brushes and oil paints! To paint pictures for a month or more!
How dare he use tablets and electronic ink! Photoshop and computer!
Or are you afraid that neural networks will take away the bread from creative authors-artists?
I think we've already discussed this issue with you. They won't take it away.
Venerable, famous authors do not suffer from neural networks in any way, but young people, on the contrary, only help in drawing.
And if we take Sleepy, then, for example,
HuntsmanCommunity wrote a good post on the previous page that the speed of posting Sleep content is not enough to cover the information need in the sprawling universe ...
The fact that 10 years have passed, and the story of many key characters is written like a stool.
And he clearly doesn't have enough time to write out the characters in detail...
For me, for example, a neural network can help in the image that Sleepy will never draw!
For example, I would like to see my favorite characters in a different aspect, in different roles, something beyond the "dungeon of torture" and bdsm whips.
Characters who are busy with household items.
But the subscribers in the voting won't allow it, and in 10 years there will be naked asses and strap-ons!
And then a neural network appears that will allow me to get it. Yes, not from the author. Well, at least that way.
After all, in fact it is... Fanfiction.
Surely you won't claim that fanfiction somehow threatens the authors of the works?
Your position is understandable, but the protest is more like a character: Don Quixote and his war with the mills.