- Jan 21, 2022
- 10,065
- 19,549
I'm confused. What does your reply have to do with this:My understanding is they run Legal brothels there for the protection of the women but porn wasn't run the same way & they looked into that. I could be wrong.
Like you had to use protection to bang a prostitute at a place of their own choosing, but with porn its do whatever.
Its like in some places in the US- prostitution illegal, but get your friend to film it in the corner (for publication) and suddenly its fine
They are treated differently when they are kinda two sides of the same coin.
Or this...Project mockingbird but with humiliation porn to make a more subservient middle and upper class? Goes along with news media trying to class it as the thinking mans fetish.
Yeah, there is one state where certain areas of it that have legal prostitution within licensed brothels: Nevada, the total population of counties where it is legal is about a quarter of a million residents with about 21 brothels.the time the German government were (Or did, can't remember) promote Femdom and interracial porn to combat sexism and racism.
And as for the filming of pornography, it's only recently legal - federally - in the USA. SCOTUS decision in Miller v. California (1973) defining obscenity indirectly made certain pornography legal to film. Yes, 52 years is "recent."
But back on topic - your point doesn't explain the conspiracies listed in HereBeRickets's post.
Oh, I see I missed a convo - so some of my points were already made. c'est la vie.
Feminist Porn is not FemDom porn. It's porn that is created using the framework of Feminist theory that disrupts sexism, racism, and other bias -isms for equity and equality.You must be registered to see the links
The Daily Mail provided more details about the event, but it's a polarizing news source being centre right.
You must be registered to see the links
To
You must be registered to see the links
:

So, the idea is that through supporting porn using the feminist framework is a form of knowledge and action to disrupt the system that is oppressive and discriminatory.
Also, it was some members of one political party within Germany that was proposing it.
SEVEN YEARS AGO.
It was never adopted - unlike your original assertion. From the sources you linked:

and:
But it went nowhere. It was never done. SEVEN YEARS AGO.
Unlike what you first said that it was actually done.
Again, who would be against equality and equity, as well as supporting positive mental and physical health?