Unity Something Unlimited [v2.4.8] [Gunsmoke Games]

[ChefGoldblum]

One page ago, "lmao people will complain about milking"
This page "hey uh, you're not getting anything really this two month cycle because of...uh...stuff. B-but later! Yeah later you'll get something. Please pay two months for one release with nothing noticeable added. Thenk."

 

[HaseoOfDeath]

One page ago, "lmao people will complain about milking"
This page "hey uh, you're not getting anything really this two month cycle because of...uh...stuff. B-but later! Yeah later you'll get something. Please pay two months for one release with nothing noticeable added. Thenk."

Yet you are here posting. Must not be that bad of a game or update schedule if people like you keep coming back huh?

 

[Franky2t]

is it me or does Miss Martian looks subpar compared to the other girls?

 

[SmokeShank]

One page ago, "lmao people will complain about milking"
This page "hey uh, you're not getting anything really this two month cycle because of...uh...stuff. B-but later! Yeah later you'll get something. Please pay two months for one release with nothing noticeable added. Thenk."

Work is being done, what Haseo was trying to do was not spoil what was going on. Last months build was "a buggy piece of shit" (not my words but the community) so what do we do? We go and fix a bunch of stuff in order to remedy that. SR7 tackled animations this month, he worked on several with the expectation that he could finish them. Unfortunately they are not up to snuff (due to the community not wanting a buggy piece of shit). Remember the doing X instead of Y thing I mentioned as #2 complaint. I wasn't laughing when I posted that comment, I was being sarcastic, meaning that those comments were going to come irregardless of the content or production value of what we put out.

 

[Gnutt]

Hmm... So I'm guessing some Raven content to passify the unwashed masses (unless this is the animation he's having trouble with,) Terra content because Sunset hasn't become sick of drawing her yet and Harley redraw because she needed it. Maybe some Killer Frost if there is time or alternately some BF/SF content. I'm cool with a bug fix edition. It's time I restarted anyway... I'm way up in the 300s on days.

 

[mielle88]

So... This update only focus on mercy or louis?

 

[Thornhill]

I would prefer that the Dev gave the existing characters some more content, instead of adding even more plates he's spinning already. In the last update, we were given a pretty big package on one single new character , while many older characters got nothing. Each new character is a new plate needing to be spinned, many are looking almost stale for a while now, i would rather see those characters getting fleshed out, before new characters were added. But hey, content is content, i'll take what i can get.

 

[Deleted member 302494]

Hey, Haseo and Smokey,

I've noticed you guys have reached a bit of a plateau for your monthly income on Patreon and I have a suggestion. The $20 and $50 patrons don't receive anything more than gratitude and from what I've seen on here, a lot of people are usually upset with what SR7 decides to work on for each new build. Why not develop a voting system? SR7 can come up with a sheet of characters and their content that needs to be developed and voters can decide on who and what they want for the next build. It can be a point based system with $20 patrons having their votes count as 1 point and $50 patrons having their votes count as 3. It might not bring in any new patrons, but some of the insider (maybe even basic level) patrons would probably bump up their monthly contributions for that kind of offer.

Obviously, the voting system would need to be refined a bit more to match SR7's workload and it would have to meet certain time limits so that he can have his full agenda before starting on each build, but maybe you can run the idea past him and see if it's something you guys think would work.

 

[MilkShank]

Hey, Haseo and Smokey,

I've noticed you guys have reached a bit of a plateau for your monthly income on Patreon and I have a suggestion. The $20 and $50 patrons don't receive anything more than gratitude and from what I've seen on here, a lot of people are usually upset with what SR7 decides to work on for each new build. Why not develop a voting system? SR7 can come up with a sheet of characters and their content that needs to be developed and voters can decide on who and what they want for the next build. It can be a point based system with $20 patrons having their votes count as 1 point and $50 patrons having their votes count as 3. It might not bring in any new patrons, but some of the insider (maybe even basic level) patrons would probably bump up their monthly contributions for that kind of offer.

Obviously, the voting system would need to be refined a bit more to match SR7's workload and it would have to meet certain time limits so that he can have his full agenda before starting on each build, but maybe you can run the idea past him and see if it's something you guys think would work.

Wow $20 just to vote!!?
Thats a bargain
And make it a yearly update as well
But seriously ur right though

 

[Deleted member 302494]

Wow $20 just to vote!!?
Thats a bargain

At least it's better than giving $20 and receiving no more than those who give $10.

 

[MilkShank]

At least it's better than giving $20 and receiving no more than those who give $10.

Thats a good point but everyone who pledged should be able to vote not just the higher tier

 

[Deleted member 302494]

Thats a good point but everyone who pledged should be able to vote not just the higher tier

It'd be a point based system, so maybe those that pledge at $5 and $10 could vote, but those that pledge more would have greater weight with their votes. It seems only fair that those willing to pledge $50 should have much more say than those only pledging $5. Still, this is only a suggestion and a rough draft at best. It would need some refinement, and that's considering the SR7 team even likes the idea at all.

 

[MilkShank]

It'd be a point based system, so maybe those that pledge at $5 and $10 could vote, but those that pledge more would have greater weight with their votes. It seems only fair that those willing to pledge $50 should have much more say than those only pledging $5. Still, this is only a suggestion and a rough draft at best. It would need some refinement, and that's considering the SR7 team even likes the idea at all.

Yeah i agree with you but they rather go with yearly update than a voting system

 

[redknight00]

Good luck trying to get some creative control out of Sunsetriders7's hands.

 

[Deleted member 302494]

Yeah i agree with you but they rather go with yearly update than a voting system

Yeah, but the whole point of the voting system isn't just to make the whole process more consumer friendly. It's also to try and get them more money, which will help them build their team. They've been hovering around $9600-$9800 a month for quite a while now and that's still quite a ways off from their goal of $11,000. This system adds extra incentive for people to pledge more. People who want a say/greater say in what content they want at the end of the two months will shell out more and the SR7 team's monthly income increases. This should lead to the team growing and, hopefully, newer/better content coming out.

 

[Deleted member 302494]

Good luck trying to get some creative control out of Sunsetriders7's hands.

Unless they offer more, they are stuck with figuring out ways to get new patrons to pledge money as their only way of increasing their monthly income.

 

[MilkShank]

Unless they offer more, they are stuck with figuring out ways to get new patrons to pledge money as their only way of increasing their monthly income.

They could increase their worktime by making it a tree month update

 

[Deleted member 302494]

They could increase their worktime by making it a tree month update

I'd rather they reach their goal, bring on an animator or programmer full time, and have them help with the game. Hell, if they could get to the point where they could afford both, it could lead to bi-monthly updates with more/better content and significantly less bugs. This leads to happier consumers who will be willing to continue putting money in their pockets. Everyone wins.

 

[MilkShank]

I'd rather they reach their goal, bring on an animator or programmer full time, and have them help with the game. Hell, if they could get to the point where they could afford both, it could lead to bi-monthly updates with more/better content and significantly less bugs. This leads to happier consumers who will be willing to continue putting money in their pockets. Everyone wins.

But here we are stuck with a bi monthly update with the equivalent 1 month update and they're the only ones happy and winning

 

[Deleted member 302494]

But here we are stuck with a bi monthly update with the equivalent 1 month update and they're the only ones happy and winning

That's why I think the voting system would work. It would pretty much guarantee that they have to complete a certain amount by the agreed time. And if not, they risk the possibility of losing patrons or having them downgrade.