I came here to post exactly that, but you were faster.
I've seen her turning an alley picture generated in SD to a blender environment, it required a lot of work and a lot of blender knownledge.
You don't need to create 3d model to have nightmares with blender, the clunky interface, the mandatory keynboard shortcuts, the infinite submenu on everything, it's insane, 10x harder than photoshop.
Ikr. I agree. Daz Studio is the same with endless menu's etc.
Have you worked with blender? I'm thinking that in the future we'll be somehow able to put our ai generated character in blender and get a mesh, skeleton and all that stuff magically created with some AI plugin, and then as much we'll have to manually correct it.As someone who does/did 3d models as a day job..depending what you want from it, this process will be a nightmare. If what you're after is just a talking head, then sure, go for it. But if you want a body attached to it, it's going to be a pain in the ass to set it up. That's a useful "hack" to get to a result fast, but if anyone is thinking of any proper production, I'd stay away from it.
Oh, also..ARKit sucks.
For a talking head however, it's good and easy, just not for anything more sadly.
PS. Phone app with a talking head like that and connected to ChatGPT now that they released it? As a personal assistant of course. Now, that's interesting.
A little. I used Maya for my basic modelling. And when I tried Blender it was atrocious. Since v3 it's much easier to use I think and there's a range of very good plugins for it. Though lately I've been working with textures and materials much more so than with 3d, so my Blender knowledge is limited.
Yeah, I watched it, but as I said I'm waiting for the process to be more polished, with an AI plugin inside blender doing 90% of the job.
