[Stable Diffusion] Prompt Sharing and Learning Thread

Snow972

Member
Dec 4, 2017
117
406
Hello, could someone give me a hand? I'm starting with "stable diffusion" and at boot time it gets stuck at DiffusionWrapper has 859.52 M params.
1680710869202.png

I have used the installer and more solutions such as clearing the cache, using the installer and pressing enter but it still does not advance.


I really don't know what I'm doing wrong
 

Mr-Fox

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
1,401
3,804


Take a look at the install instructions. "Make sure the required are met and follow the instructions available for both (recommended) and GPUs. "


  1. Install , checking "Add Python to PATH".
  2. Install
  3. Download the stable-diffusion-webui repository, for example by running git clone .
  4. Run webui-user.bat from Windows Explorer as normal, non-administrator, user.

    Watch this to see how git clone works
 

Snow972

Member
Dec 4, 2017
117
406
Did you open that bug? Or are there other pilgrims having the same issue currently:
In my case it shows no error. Perhaps we will have to wait more to see if it marks any errors.
How long do I have to wait for it to go from "DiffusionWrapper has 859.52M"?
 

Snow972

Member
Dec 4, 2017
117
406


Take a look at the install instructions. "Make sure the required are met and follow the instructions available for both (recommended) and GPUs. "


  1. Install , checking "Add Python to PATH".
  2. Install
  3. Download the stable-diffusion-webui repository, for example by running git clone .
  4. Run webui-user.bat from Windows Explorer as normal, non-administrator, user.

    Watch this to see how git clone works
I followed the steps and installed everything correctly I will test again and
I will leave it open for a few hours to see if there is any change
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr-Fox

Nano999

Member
Jun 4, 2022
172
73
A quick question
I set XYZ 2 params and if I change the batch count above 2 generated images will be sorted in a wrong way
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Mr-Fox

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
1,401
3,804
A quick question
I set XYZ 2 params and if I change the batch count above 2 generated images will be sorted in a wrong way

e.g.
batch size - 5
XYZ:
denoise: 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6
sampler: euler, karras

In this case I will get following images:

euler a image #1 0.1
euler a image #2 0.2
euler a image #3 0.3
euler a image #4 0.4
euler a image #5 0.5
euler a image #5 0.6

euler a image #1 0.1
euler a image #2 0.2
euler a image #3 0.3
euler a image #4 0.4
euler a image #5 0.5
euler a image #5 0.6

etc.

disordered

But instead I want to get the following order:

euler a image #1 0.1
euler a image #1 0.2
euler a image #1 0.3
euler a image #1 0.4
euler a image #1 0.5
euler a image #1 0.6

karras image #1 0.1
karras image #1 0.2
karras image #1 0.3
karras image #1 0.4
karras image #1 0.5
karras image #1 0.6

euler a image #2 0.1

etc.

Is it possible? Otherwise I have to change batch count to 1 and manually start generating each new count
You need to set the sampler as X axis and denoising as Y axis. This should give you the result you want. If you only wish to do a comparison you don't need to set batch count or size, plot script does this.
If you wish to try this with multiple seeds for different sample images, you can either set the first seed and run the script and then manually set the next seed and run the script again, or use batch count.
For 5 different seeds, set the first seed and then set batch count to 5 and then run the script. You will get 5 plot script grids I believe, one for each seed. I'm not completely sure of this since I never did this myself.
You could perhaps get one huge grid, I don't know what that would look like though.
 
Last edited:

Mr-Fox

Well-Known Member
Jan 24, 2020
1,401
3,804
With permission from Nano I'm sharing a small comparison between his image and using my recommended settings in this post and also this post.
It's only a simple comparison and a demonstration that I'm not talking out of my sweet behind..
Of course you can use slightly different settings and also get good result,
my recommendations are only guide lines or "rule of thumb".

Nano's original imageUsing my settings and denoising 0.2
Lanczos upscaler
Using my settings and denoising 0.2
NMKD Superscale
00322-1385130500.png 00023-1385130500.png 00024-1385130500.png