But why is some content skippable then if it wasn't meant to be skipped? If someone wants to pay for the game on Steam, does it really matter if they want to skip some of the content? I'd say make the best game you can with the resources you have and let everyone enjoy it in their own way.It is not that simple. What, if player decide to skip 4 of 5 routes or even all of them? Corruption will make no sense then, as normal girl will become corrupted without any particular reason.
When I buy a Bethesda RPG, say Skyrim, am I a bad person if I play it once for 300 hours and only have one character that's only a stealthy archer? I am after all missing out on all the melee and magic combat...
Now you've just got a kinetic novel, playing out the way the author wants. This is not tagged as a kinetic novel. Should re-tag the game and have the open world elements and choices removed. In fact all choices, as why would you refuse anything? Why does Corruption only play out the way you or anyone else thinks it should? If I want her to go at 50% corruption, why does that ruin other people's fun?You just can’t allow the player to skip everything they don’t like, so I kinda agree with other opinion - you don’t play FIFA, if you don’t like football.
Taking your own soccer comparison. Why can't I play just quick matches? Why not career mode? Why not just one game, set it aside and never play it again? Taking it even further, that's like walking into a ice cream shop and one person standing in there telling you that you can only have 2 scoops on a waffle cone. The top scoop must be vanilla flavor and the bottom scoop must be habanero cheddar flavor, as that's the only right way.
Even on regular sandbox and open world games, I never understand why people get so annoyed/upset/worked up when someone else plays in that world differently then they do. You do you, and let me do me and let's just play the game and have fun how we each want.