- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,864
Unreal Engine Completed Subverse [v1.0] [Studio Fow]
- Jul 25, 2018
- 700
- 1,101
Nope, I was checking the wrong one indeed. The starting post links to Studiofow instead of @subversegame. Thanks!
I think somewhere between now and 10-14 October is indeed likely if they say early, and then I don't know if the prefer certain days over other days, which also might change the date. And then of course there could also always be a delay still (although personally I think that's unlikely at this stage)
It's torture. They shouldn't announce the release day. I will be dead by that time.
I haven't played the game yet and have been waiting for more content since April : )
I haven't played the game yet and have been waiting for more content since April : )
- Sep 4, 2017
- 1,052
- 2,189
Early October is the first day of the month for regular people yes.
I'm not sure it's the same thing for people working in a project with little to none pressure.
Don't get your hopes too high.
Not saying they won't respect their deadline, just saying that we're in an industry (porn game) where it's quite common to have delays.
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,864
- Jul 25, 2018
- 700
- 1,101
- Sep 4, 2017
- 1,052
- 2,189
Still think Killy is the sexiest girl in their game, but Ela model seems to be top tier.
- Sep 4, 2020
- 196
- 84
- Apr 12, 2019
- 377
- 174
Pandora is getting "big" upgrades later on they are saying, such as transitions and even changing camera angles. They havent said much more than that or when though so take it with a HUGE pinch of salt..
That's awesome to hear. I would imagine the transition thing being discussed would really help the scene feel like it has a lot better flow from start to finish. As you said though, probably a good idea to take with a grain of salt.
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,864
Just note the Pandora changes won't be til after this update, so preemptive shield to those who'll repeat their complaints about it being '5 second gifs' again.
- Sep 4, 2020
- 196
- 84
but they are right its just a 5 second gifs
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,864
I'd encourage you and anyone else that says the same thing to go download UE4 and make an animation yourself and see how long it takes to render a 5 second animation. It's very easy to critique from the outside looking in. Even SFM is a challenge to learn (mostly due to how Valve hasn't updated it), and FOW still made films in that engine that was beyond any usual smut.
any1 who holds fow to their own standard can rightfully be underwhelmed by the porn section of the game. every scene compiled is probably still shorter than any of their movies
Well, hate to break it to ya, but what Thrway said earlier is dead-to-rights accurate - when you've got a professional animation and porn studio getting $2M in initial funding, expectations are present and that's not going away. Especially considering what we see some devs here on F95 create on their own in their spare time with no kickstarter funding at all.
Hopefully it'll get better.
- Sep 4, 2020
- 196
- 84
well i am not a game dev right i'm just a customere and when i am gone a buy something i expect it to be good now i dont say game is bad is good but sex scenes is just soo basic for a porn game no difference between this one and normal porn there should be more freedom i'm just saying that at least we should able to control camera angles or change position not stuck in a one simple position and loop
- Dec 9, 2017
- 2,738
- 6,864
Like a brick wall...just keep waving that big number like it was that exact number (it wasn't), like the money can just be automatically mashed into the computer to make the best porn ever. It doesn't work that way. Either you overexpected, or have no idea how little that still is compared to full on video games that are sold for 60 dollars.
Game with porn, not a porn game, remember.
Game with porn, not a porn game, remember.
And like a brick wall (funny insult from you considering how you aren't even remotely objective with any criticism of the game), you just keep disregarding what other people have fairly pointed out that other devs have put out better content on borderline zero budget. So you can keep trying to minimize that $2M initial funding amount all you want - I don't care - the fact of the matter is this was made by a studio famous for their porn animation quality, and the adult content was part of the marketing.
Their kickstarter goal for the game was nowhere near $2M, but people readily donated far in excess of what they were asking for, so when I see criticism, I think it's very fair considering the state of the game at launch in a variety of areas.
Maybe it will be absolutely fantastic eventually (who knows, maybe even this next update will be top shelf and turn things around), but until it is, it's fair to point out the low quality content and the problems with Pandora, just as it's fair to point out the things it does really well, like the voice acting and overall game graphics.
Holy hell Valen...give it a rest, dude. Nobody takes you even a little bit serious in this thread. Literally we've seen people counting down to your next defense post anytime someone posts a criticism of the game, no matter how legit the criticism is. This game has a shit ton wrong with it and there's nothing wrong at all with pointing that out. It does some good things, too, and those have been pointed out as well. Try to be a little more even-keeled in your eval.