Negative feedback on kickstarter was mostly related to "early access/no early access". And where are you getting your numbers inregards to 99% supporters being initial backers? And steam rating is mostly due to chinese situation.
What do you mean? The only reason the game was made was because of kickstarter backers? And I'm kind of tired of people blaming the angry Chinese review bombers for the game's score. The game's score was terrible before that whole ordeal and Steam actually removed a large number of reviews, presumably triggered by the automatic review bombing system they've had in place for years now on top of manual interventions.
All it takes is five seconds to see that a large slew of negative reviews are in English with genuine concerns, many of which are echoed here too in a lot of the negative reviews, or are those angry Chinese too, lol?
I'm not sure where you got the negative outcry being all about early access/not early access, but that was because of ALREADY EXISTING negative feedback pre-Steam early access when first starting to crack and have problems.
In response to all the negativity, they decided to instead release in episodes and finish the game over time, which is of course sometime people wouldn't like. Not only was that not the promise, most folk don't want to pay any amount for 10% of a game and hope it someday gets finished, especially not backers that already paid full-game price.
I genuinely don't remember if this part is true, but I'm pretty sure the plan was to fully launch incomplete out of EA but they backtracked on that and decided to keep the game in EA where it remains.
To an inverse, you can’t assume every new work would be dark because the majority of their films were. You’re creating false expectations. The tone was very clearly indicated in the initial trailer alone. The sex being referred to as handholding, the joke about not being featured at GDC, referring to the captain as a loser of no significance whatsoever (who is also a reference to Hentai Kamen, not Deadpool). Later trailers continue the comedic tone and early interviews indicated it’d be one of their more vanilla projects.
Regarding your examples, yea avatar could easily be considered a dark story, but told in a way children could view and understand it. It was after all a story about a child trying to stop a war.
Much of the deleted feedback was either conspiratorial crap, or the pointless drama the Chinese base caused about the whole translation explanation.
No, a lot of the deleted posts were about the choice to release in episodes or the pandora system, etc. Again, we knew it was going to have a comedic tilt, but there was absolutely no indication that it was going to be this vanilla, so I don't know where you got that from. In fact, I'd argue it isn't considering some of the monsters you can optionally bone, but those are kind of really shoved out of the way. Still a bit shocked Steam allowed it though to be honest.
Most of us were expecting dark humor, not a fluffy, very vanilla orgy simulator, and again, that's not talking about the game's many other problems, from it's rather lackluster two game modes to the laughable story and characterization, but whatever. This is an opinion so I genuinely won't say you're wrong, but I definitely don't agree with it.
Like I said, deadpool has a very strong comedic tone, but in both the comics and the movies there it's still really, really dark and it plays with a lot of tragic themes like cancer and the curse of immortality and in the comics in particular Deadpool is played strongly against Woverine's hard life in many heartbreaking ways (for the both of them).
Just saying that a your argument about the trailer completely explaining 99% of how the game and story would be is silly. No trailer does that.