- Apr 28, 2017
- 1,018
- 1,216
I don't think that's considered 'finishing', sir or madam.Also...you can just quit.
I don't think that's considered 'finishing', sir or madam.Also...you can just quit.
It's sir... and I disagree.If you never go to school again you are quite finished with school.I don't think that's considered 'finishing', sir or madam.
I hope we will see WT for 0.3 with the changes that the dev added to the first 2 days.Well, i had some time and made a walkthrough so far. If you find any mistakes, please inform me and i would update it.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
As a player, I hate losing my saves too. As a dev, I'll try to avoid it as much as possible.You really shouldn't do shit like that. Even with the best pre-planning it's common for game devs to have "great ideas" while making a game or having to cut content due to lack of time/money but you're almost always better off saving it all for the next game than taking the time to remake a product especially if you've already released it to the public thus annoying them by devaluing if not completely negating their saves.
Yes, it is.During the night, is it possible to do something more than a hug with the sister ?
Nope. I've always been Naughty.Naughty Captain, in a former life, you wouldn't by any chance happen to have been known as Cap'n Stabbin', would you?
There are undeniably some parts I could rewrite to make things more understandable or more plausible. Like the anger of Cassie in the first breakfast scene. I'm thinking of adding a couple more paragraphs in day 1 and day 2 to define characters more precisely. It may help the player understanding their behavior and their decisions.I like it a lot, but i can't get over the whole lifetime channel special feeling i get from this. like its some chick flick. I don't think guys think to them selves "she's not some piece of meat" when they decide to not check a girl out, or go into a frenzy of how shitty they are to someone who was just as shitty to them. You can call it taking the high road or being the bigger person, but doing that doesn't mean you should just shut out how you are treated in an unhealthy relationship. They both are at fault here but its really not feeling like that's the case anymore, which means the opening to the game is basically pointless. Guys like romance just as much and want to protect the women in their lives, but they are also aware when they are treated like shit and can be susceptible to abusive relationships as well. I'm sorry if it seems like im ranting but as someone who has been in a abusive situation like this, it urks me seeing these kind of lifetime scenarios.
With all that said keep doing what you do. I look forward to playing more of it despite my hangups lol
Just like Eve, Cassie is inexperienced. So we could say that her dom side is also somehow new to her. She's trying it. And it's also something she's hiding.I'm not sure I'm a fan of automatic Eve Submission or Cassie Dominance increases. I feel like the player should choose whatever they wish to allow. But if those instances are few and far between and/or don't force behaviors that one might not want, I can look past them.
If I'm honest, Cassie's attempts at trying to dominate are almost out of character compared to what we've seen of her so far. She's been forward, and she's definitely been flirtatious, but domineering? Not really. I don't know whether she's supposed to have just been hiding this side of herself, whether she's just trying it out as something new, or whether earlier forwardness / flirting is supposed to have been "dominance light" somehow, but I didn't get the sense that Cassie would be the dominant sort previously. I don't dislike it, but it was a bit of a surprise and seems a bit forced with this update.
That said, I'm totally continuing to love this game. There's great writing with a deep plot and rich characters who are interesting and generate empathy. An excellent game so far, definitely deserving of more exposure and recognition.
Thank you, it'll be corrected in V0.3.5.Found a bug