- Jan 15, 2017
- 2,932
- 3,973
1)Yea, that's clearly an opinion, and I wouldn't posit it as anything else. Describing something as great, i.e., "Sushi is great" can usually be inferred to be an opinion.1) That is an opinion and one I don't share.
2) Well I personally would care and I would imagine a fair bit of people would. There's just something depraved about it that turns me off. That's how I see it though and if you think differently, whatever.
3) Don't speak for another person, they said people with small peepees and that's what I'm going to take that as. If they want to step in and clarify so be it. It's ironic you put it as insecurity, when it seems you are plagued by the very same thing my friend.
Of course you don't have to self insert, but many choose to and that is what a lot of creators want you to do. And saying that you wouldn't want to insert oneself into an action, horror, or porn movie is pretty stupid. And besides, self-insertion has little if anything to do with it. Now this might be a novel concept to one such as yourself, but some people just simply don't like a certain fetish or genre. And that has nothing to do with being insecure or an issue of self insertion, just simply preference. Going by your logic, where insecurity and self insertion is the driving concern, everybody should enjoy watching scat porn or bestiality porn so long as they're not insecure or self inserting themselves into those mediums.
I'm afraid your logic is flawed and makes little sense overall. Like what you like my friend, but don't be insecure and belittle people for not sharing your views.
2)Thanks for recognizing that opinions differ on this point. You posited the situation as "Imagine if..." so I answered in kind.
3)Inferring the descriptor of "small peepee" to be not literal, but reinforcing symbolism for "insecure" is a natural step, just as 'small-hearted' or 'pusillanimous' can be inferred to not literally be representations of the size of one's heart or whatever one considers to be a soul. I'm not sure where you're inferring insecurity on my part.
Sorry if you feel I impose self-insertion on you, but you do seem to imply that you do so with your hypothetical pregnant mother situation. I don't know what creators expect of me when consuming their work, and I understand that many consumers choose to self-insert and have no problem with that. I'm not sure how not wanting to self-insert into a work of fiction in which horrific violence is occurring is "stupid". I'm merely asking people who choose to self-insert into works of fiction or depictions of fictional scenarios not to do so, and imagine it from that perspective, same as you ask people to imagine their mothers in a pregnancy porn film.
I'm not putting this on you, and sorry if it seems like I do, but many people who post on here about disliking or hating fetishes like NTR, BDSM, sharing, MM group sex, do so extremely emotionally and while belittling people who like or aren't bothered by those fetishes. Interpreting that as insecurity is not belittling but merely interpreting an emotional response as insecurity, like a guy who spends time talking about how tough he is and how inadequate he perceives other men to be.
This will end well .....