he said it on today´s streamDid he say that or are you just talking out your ass?
he said it on today´s streamDid he say that or are you just talking out your ass?
Couldn't the Patreons still vote for Jenny?Not for now, no. DC doesn't want to do those bits of work twice since after all the story would likely be different and dialog still requires posing etc. So yes, he could do them, as he said, but not for now and things like the cult etc. will get priority (what excatly will of course be up to the patreon vote).
If she'd be in the poll, yes. But I doubt that's going to happen.Couldn't the Patreons still vote for Jenny?
He said it today and several times within the last days.Did he say that or are you just talking out your ass?
Well everything will depend on patreon alternatives. If he'll find something good it may happen sooner and I' say there'll certainly be some kind of update at some point anyway since I doubt he'd not give them at least a little bit of conclusive content. I'd wait at leats a couple of months and see what happens. It wouldn't be the first time that he's changing his plans.He said on stream a while ago that he might just add the content when the game is finished and move on to another project. So maybe we wont be getting any new incest at all.
Well, a patch can bring old dialog back but can't introduce new content. And I can totally understand that DC doesn't want people who aren't related to the project to coin those dialogs for him and change his vision of the game and story. So his only way out of that problem would be to release those patches himself which would mean a lot of additional work and likely the risk to get his whole project banned by patreon in case they find out.lol someone is already posting some stuff about ''patch'' under new status update.
Well, it WON'T HAPPEN. This afternoon/evening/night said he won't make a "Patreon patch" and an "incest patch" each time he's going to release an update. So, there won't be patches FROM HIM. And There won't be NEW incest content as long as he stays with Patreon.Well, a patch can bring old dialog back but can't introduce new content. And I can totally understand that DC doesn't want people who aren't related to the project to coin those dialogs for him and change his vision of the game and story. So his only way out of that problem would be to release those patches himself which would mean a lot of additional work and likely the risk to get his whole project banned by patreon in case they find out.
I was actually talking about user made patches and why those are - in effect - likely an additional reason why DC won't make any further updates to sis', Diane's and mum's story. If he'd release new "clean" content for those some users would remodel it and coin a new narrative that isn't his. That's of course my interpretation but likely an additional point next to "too much work" .Well, it WON'T HAPPEN. This afternoon/evening/night said he won't make a "Patreon patch" and an "incest patch" each time he's going to release an update. So, there won't be patches FROM HIM. And There won't be NEW incest content as long as he stays with Patreon.
This is what he said. Nothing more, nothing less. So, let's forget new Sis, Mom and Aunt content for the time being.
It would be easier for him to just stay on pareon then move everything to a new sitequestion is there any reason he cant leave patreon and do his own thing?
I agree. If you look at my dating history, there was a strong trend in the direction of Eve and Grace type chicks.Am I the only one here interested in tattoo girl and smoking hot sister Eve? Roxy is a slut and I don't like her.
As other people have explained, Patreon will immediately cancel the accounts of any creator who does this. That's what makes Patreon's actions especially evil - they're claiming control over material that's not even on their goddamn site. They are censors.It would be easier for him to just stay on pareon then move everything to a new site
But there are jurisdictions where the depiction of incest or ********** is expressly forbidden. (The school setting of SS could be problematic, notwithstanding any "all characters are over 18" disclosure) There is no such prohibition on depictions of murder. If Patreon is allowing that kind of content to be distributed into those jurisdictions, it could create exposure.Murder is against the law in California, too, but many games have killing as part of a story. This is fiction, fictional characters, not real, made up, imaginary.
Well, I won't argue that there have been some spectacularly unconstitutional court cases cooked up by ambitious prosecutors over the years. But the legal default is the First Amendment. Exceptions to it have traditionally been very small and narrowly defined.But there are jurisdictions where the depiction of incest or ********** is expressly forbidden. (The school setting of SS could be problematic, notwithstanding any "all characters are over 18" disclosure) There is no such prohibition on depictions of murder. If Patreon is allowing that kind of content to be distributed into those jurisdictions, it could create exposure.
The law in the US surrounding drawn porn is actually something of a gray area of both IP and 1st Amendment law.