Collection Video Sumthingextra69 Collection [2025-02-17] [SuMthinDiFrnt]

4.50 star(s) 2 Votes
Discussion Reviews (2)
N

Noname55

Member
Sep 17, 2017
269
592
gapgun said:
The last time anyone used SFM was back in 2020 and even that was pushing its shelf life. Why don't you try to convince him to install windows 95 and get a Myspace account while you're at it.
Click to expand...
It doesn't look bad at all and it takes far less render time, also he had years of experience animating in it. I mean, noname'e animations are still made in SFM. Still, I think his animations would still be scarce even in SFM these days. Animating is no longer his job, and he's married, no one should expect much.
 
D

Deleted member 3633846

Newbie
Apr 26, 2021
54
96
StickyJammedPotato said:
Anyone staying in SFM and not moving to Blender is purposely handicapping themselves.
Click to expand...
That is true. It is objectively the software that offers more dynamic lighting, higher quality rendering and a larger variety of animation tools. In fact it has all the same functionalities as Maya, 3Dmax and Daz studio. Many on this thread seem to insist on the use of SFM despite most of them having little to no 3D animation experience which kind of p*sses me off. Something else I don't understand Is a lot of these guys seem to attribute bad camerawork editing and model choices to Blender itself and can't seem to make observations about his work that logically follow. It's like saying "I don't like how this movie was shot. If only it was released in 4K format instead of HD it would look completely different." No offence but some of you don't even have half brain. There's a saying in the movie business "Shit in, Shit out."
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: BootyDreamz, Qmaaer3D, StickyJammedPotato and 1 other person
O

Oriandu

Engaged Member
Sep 1, 2017
3,004
5,546
gapgun said:
That is true. It is objectively the software that offers more dynamic lighting, higher quality rendering and a larger variety of animation tools. In fact it has all the same functionalities as Maya, 3Dmax and Daz studio. Many on this thread seem to insist on the use of SFM despite most of them having little to no 3D animation experience which kind of p*sses me off. Something else I don't understand Is a lot of these guys seem to attribute bad camerawork editing and model choices to Blender itself and can't seem to make observations about his work that logically follow. It's like saying "I don't like how this movie was shot. If only it was released in 4K format instead of HD it would look completely different." No offence but some of you don't even have half brain. There's a saying in the movie business "Shit in, Shit out."
Click to expand...
The funniest part about that insistence on sticking with SFM is that the issues Sumthindifrnt has with his work isn't even due to blender. Blender doesn't force him to use bad camera angles, blender doesn't force him to use awful character models, blender doesn't make him use the same four sound effects over and over again, blender doesn't force him to focus heavily on racist tropes, and blender is not responsible for his lack of animation skill, understanding of anatomy, and his inability to choreograph a scene. Sum wasn't any better on SFM he was just surrounded by people with a similar skill set and his abilities have remained stagnant while his peers have all either advanced beyond him or given up on trying to make NSFW animations because they don't have the chops. Sum can't even compete in his own brand of porn anymore, animators like Jackerman do a better job doing what Sum tries to do, their minimum efforts eclipse his maximum. GOing back to SFM won't fix his animations just as switching to Blender did not cause them to drop in quality.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BootyDreamz, Fergie, Qmaaer3D and 2 others
StickyJammedPotato

StickyJammedPotato

Member
Aug 10, 2020
445
1,347
Thank you gapgun and Oriandu for elaborating beyond my single sentence lol. I was going to come back and elaborate on it further but you both covered everything I would have said.

Hopefully our boy ends up getting more proficient with Blender and maybe looks into some "porn camera angles" lmao
 
Qmaaer3D

Qmaaer3D

Member
Nov 1, 2021
114
209
Oriandu said:
The funniest part about that insistence on sticking with SFM is that the issues Sumthindifrnt has with his work isn't even due to blender. Blender doesn't force him to use bad camera angles, blender doesn't force him to use awful character models, blender doesn't make him use the same four sound effects over and over again, blender doesn't force him to focus heavily on racist tropes, and blender is not responsible for his lack of animation skill, understanding of anatomy, and his inability to choreograph a scene. Sum wasn't any better on SFM he was just surrounded by people with a similar skill set and his abilities have remained stagnant while his peers have all either advanced beyond him or given up on trying to make NSFW animations because they don't have the chops. Sum can't even compete in his own brand of porn anymore, animators like Jackerman do a better job doing what Sum tries to do, their minimum efforts eclipse his maximum. GOing back to SFM won't fix his animations just as switching to Blender did not cause them to drop in quality.
Click to expand...
even my shitty animations look better than his blender works lol
 
  • Hey there
Reactions: GreeperDark3dART
Qmaaer3D

Qmaaer3D

Member
Nov 1, 2021
114
209
gapgun said:
That is true. It is objectively the software that offers more dynamic lighting, higher quality rendering and a larger variety of animation tools. In fact it has all the same functionalities as Maya, 3Dmax and Daz studio. Many on this thread seem to insist on the use of SFM despite most of them having little to no 3D animation experience which kind of p*sses me off. Something else I don't understand Is a lot of these guys seem to attribute bad camerawork editing and model choices to Blender itself and can't seem to make observations about his work that logically follow. It's like saying "I don't like how this movie was shot. If only it was released in 4K format instead of HD it would look completely different." No offence but some of you don't even have half brain. There's a saying in the movie business "Shit in, Shit out."
Click to expand...
As someone who has just graduated from film school, I can say that you are absolutely right in what you wrote. It's all about the creator's aesthetic point of view and being stylistic. So are the movies. 28 days later is a movie shot with a very crappy camera, the man from earth's budget is ridiculously low, but these are movies that can be watched over and over again. This man's sfm works was so much better because there was a story he managed to tell. I used to be a fan of The Neighbor's Wife series because it had a decent storytelling and editing. When he switched to blender, he could not progress graphically and create a story he could tell. I can count the mistakes he made one by one, but I don't know if he is reading what is written here. I'm really sorry for this setback. I really loved watching his works.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silvertf and Unless
I

intervortex

New Member
Jun 28, 2023
4
3
PeqPeq said:
I don't know if i am allowed to post it here. Here is the full version though 26 min.
You must be registered to see the links
Click to expand...
I find it quite good. Except for the camera being to close, it was good enough. I enjoyed the story and I really hope Tilla and Aburi get together eventually, getting married and having many children together!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
4.50 star(s) 2 Votes