Ttales went from having a unique and appealing art style, to the same generic overly plump and shiny AI generated bimbo slop with vaguely similar faces. It sucks and can barely be considered art anymore.
I get what you’re saying. But it’s learning and improving its mistakes.
In the latest update, there was hardly any of that, if any at all.
> Trained to hate it
lol. lmao even.
nobody was "trained" to hate AI. we gave it a fair shake. it just looks bad.
Or is what you mean that "we grew up consuming high quality hand drawn art and top quality 3d art. which trained us enjoy quality and hate trash"?
because... yea, sure. I was "trained" to hate trash quality art by all that good art I consumed over the decades.
I won't apologize for liking quality and hating trash.
Yes, in our adult industry, there are some genuinely talented and powerful artists (who could easily make a good living in mainstream industries). Of course, they exist, but there are very, very few of them. Most of the truly skilled artists, unfortunately, leave for the mainstream industry - ArtStation is proof of that. And yeah, Uber falls into this category, maybe not at the start of his career, but definitely now.
Let’s move on - 99% of the games here are DAZ 3D garbage (and it’s not DAZ's fault—everything is poorly rendered, lacks proper composition, lighting, color balance, with basic, downloaded models, clothes, backgrounds, and so on). Are you kidding me? What kind of “high-quality” 3D did you get used to here? None of these creators would ever get hired in a regular studio. It’s not even funny, buddy. (Yeah, I still think that if these DAZ projects exist, it's because they have satisfied players - so it’s justified. But it doesn’t change my point above.)
I won't apologize for liking quality and hating trash.
Yeah, we get it, you're posing with your refined taste. Lol, you guys are hilarious.
I will happily consume AI made art if it was actually good.
With each new piece, he's actually moving closer to using AI as a tool to refine his work properly - calling something
AI-made just shows your ignorance and lack of understanding about how it works. AI can't create things independently in complex projects from a single prompt, etc. In the industry (including Uber’s), it’s just another tool, another function to improve the work.
In fact, I very much like AI backgrounds, because AI is good at making backgrounds. Not so much when drawing humans
And this is the funniest part, proving even more that you have no clue about what you’re talking about. Try
creating a street in Uber’s style using AI, with high resolution, complete with houses, windows, doors, roads, details, etc. You’re in for a big surprise, but of course, you won’t admit it.
I’ll just adjust the crown on your avatar again. Right now, neither Flux, nor Pony, nor anything that came before can do it right without you spending dozens of hours cleaning up mistakes. And this problem applies to almost any task, but you picked one of the worst examples, lol. Go ahead, hero.
People need to be less lazy with AI and learn a few different styles to prompt with. AI can do anything but if you're too stupid to do more than one thing then it can't save you.
No, it can’t. It might be able to in the future, but not right now. A prompt won’t handle complex compositions, sequential stories, poses, and so on. It’s just one part of an artist’s job. For now, you still need hands-on work and constant retouching.
You’re right that Flux has significantly boosted prompt strength. But there are other issues leftover from the XL series, and the model is still pretty rough.
