You've almost 500 posts in here, should've learned how to read from immersion by now.
- Thread starter thomasxlong
- Start date
- May 6, 2017
- 3,981
- 30,803
- 643
Lotex
Engaged Member
- Jul 17, 2017
- 2,192
- 2,048
- 486
ShadrachVS
Newbie
- Jun 13, 2017
- 76
- 62
- 136
The fact you must defend your view from a non-specified statement, should be an indicator... as for the insult, who cares, you opinion differs from mine. Good for you.
However, the intent of my post is that negativity and constant whining/complaining/grumbling (whatever) accomplish Nothing; whilst the cookie meme is at least entertaining to a portion. Since I know that I can not please all, I choose instead to please some; with a particular focus on those that are actually likable to me. Oh my, I just admitted I discriminate... how horrible of me... pfft.
Now back to the originally scheduled programming________
Yes as far as I know blackmail is going to be removed, this would mean we will have to see a different method of plot device to move Kaitlyn from Uber-B&*^# to Your Uber-B#(#(... I see no issue with that, but it isn't one of my kinks.
That's saddening, one of the main reasons why I liked the game so much was because of the blackmail on the cheerleader.
It's just bad when they go around censoring stuff, we all got our fetishes. And I for one believe that living/enjoying them in a game is healthier than in life, especially that weird consensual sex with the wife... ugh.
Jokes apart, censoring this is bad mmmkay. Incest and blackmail and drugging got their erotic appeal because they're forbidden and punished by law so... just a game, why Patreon doing this shit man...
Jokes apart, censoring this is bad mmmkay. Incest and blackmail and drugging got their erotic appeal because they're forbidden and punished by law so... just a game, why Patreon doing this shit man...
I agree with you, we've become such a PC world BUT in saying that where do we stop regarding what is allowed and not allowed. I think more people who uses Patreon will frown or have a problem with certain things like allowing game devs to write incest/blackmail type games and advertise it. Although over half of those who complain also have their fetishes as you have said. It's not so gray as we may think.
Reminds me of the days of people trying to get GTA games banned.
Why is it that there seems to be far more censorship when it comes to games than there is for movies/TV shows/books/etc?
There's plenty of rape/torture/violence/murder/incest/etc. present in movies/TV shows/books/etc., but when it comes to games it seems to be far stricter.
Take Game of Thrones for instance. There's plenty of incest and the like going on there.
I think the ones that try to get everything censored/banned are the ones that really have a problem. They seem to be the ones that truly have a difficulty differentiating between reality and fantasy/fiction/make believe.
It's been happening in the last few years, as places become mainstream they're forced to adapt to what's PC
Take for instance
I'll tell you what's the difference, the difference is what's currently mainstream and accepted and what's not! playing H games on PC? Boooooo! watching brother and sister bang on series and throw a kid off a tower? MASTERPIECE! must watch! (series are great tho, but yeah... different)
Take for instance
You must be registered to see the links
picture, imagine for a moment that being a guy staring like that. What's the difference? public opinion. Public.Opinion.Censorship is always harder on newer media. Lady Chatterley's Lover was first published in 1928, two years before Hollywood widely adopted the Hays Code, which forbade showing a man and a woman even sitting on the same bed.
Differing standards for different forms of media (i.e. textual and visual) makes sense, but when both media are in the same form then it really makes no sense to have different standards.
I'd say the interactivity of games/VNs is to the visual nature of movies, as the visual nature of movies is to the textual nature of prose. The interactivity is the novel aspect that draws the additional heat. That's my guess, could be wrong. But it's hardly for no reason.
Dasati
Active Member
- May 30, 2017
- 790
- 1,290
- 361
To elaborate on that, I think it's also due to agency. When you read a book/watch a movie your a passive observer, there's a clear break between the actions of the characters and your own. With games, you play a more active role, making decisions and performing actions. Some people seem to believe that people would be unable to differentiate their actions in game to their actions in real life. Much of the outcry/attempted censorship aimed at GTA for example boils down to "we don't think your capable of seeing this as fictional. So we'll ban it to protect you". Its rather insulting towards peoples intelligence imo.
Major Wanker
Well-Known Member
- Apr 27, 2017
- 1,782
- 3,888
- 436
So far he still seems confident the update is close. From personal experience that normally means anytime within 3 days. However he still seems to think release today is likely
- Apr 7, 2017
- 941
- 2,719
- 489
He should take his time. I'd love an update today, but I'd rather he not rush it crazily so we run into game breaking bugs.
I'm gonna be shitfaced anyhow. Lol.
Major Wanker
Well-Known Member
- Apr 27, 2017
- 1,782
- 3,888
- 436
The amount of time and effort he has devoted to this is insane. Most devs would have quit. I think deem needs the update to released to recover from the massive loss hes taken and so he can keep his prpmise and reputation of being an honest dev who delivers. Its been hard for him. I have never seen any dev take things so personally as deem has. He feels he has let people down and for him the release is an attempt in his mind to try and make it upto people and regain his sanity