The people who pay for the game. As you may note if you look at the previous comments, this is not a revolutionary new insight.Go figure. 20 John updates in a row, then a system overhaul update. He's just teasing us now.
Who asked for all those John updates btw?
Yeah, this confused me, because it seems the only way to trigger low dominance sex from your family is now to be in a cage or a sissy, which is just, ehhh.So now that npc dominance is no longer tracked what do?
Yeah sounds like almost all of the people that pay for this game are Gay and enjoy getting it on with John.The people who pay for the game. As you may note if you look at the previous comments, this is not a revolutionary new insight.
Yeah if all of the people paying for the game are Gay and want lots of fun John content then this game isn't for straight people anyway.I don't get why are people so mad here. He is following what his patreons decided and is almost par for the course on the roadmap schedule. He also posts a lot of dev updates on his Patreon.
There are many worse devs in this site. I'd say you guy are pretty spoiled.
Yeah, this is reason of my avoiding this project since 2019. Too many gay content and too less new straight.Westane has even stated how sick of John he was getting towards the end. About how he just wanted to get the John stuff done and out of the way so he could focus on more enjoyable parts like the upcoming Ava/Dakota content. Basically doing the worst content that way everything else after is on the up and up.
Have you looked at this thing in Twine? I'm amazed Westane can even find shit in that mess.With 1616 Patrons and raking in at the least $8000 a month with a goal of $10,000 a month, I'm surprised the progress for this game moves so slow. There are projects with far less funding that accomplish more in far less time than this game has in the years it's been up.
So the answer to my question is a clear yes. People are still butthurt over a majority vote. For the record everyone gets the same amount of treatment. All the vote decided on was the order of development. The amount of pearl clutching here is just painful.John month no, John year.
And yes, the patrons made ONE VOTE to make a John update, but not to make 6+ of John updates
I don't understand where did you got this idea. Afaik, pool in November didn't have John as option at all. Winner was Ava and Dakota option. So butthurt is justified.So the answer to my question is a clear yes. People are still butthurt over a majority vote. For the record everyone gets the same amount of treatment. All the vote decided on was the order of development. The amount of pearl clutching here is just painful.