- Jan 27, 2019
- 2,679
- 3,993
Nah, i'm not actually Japanese.well based on your username i'd guess you named him neko then
but personally i stuck whit the default saber, i only ever rename the protagonist
Nah, i'm not actually Japanese.well based on your username i'd guess you named him neko then
but personally i stuck whit the default saber, i only ever rename the protagonist
Hard to say why maker of WT mod removed the option for those, since so far there's no bad consequences for them. Only different story directions.Hmm...What I have noticed with the walk through mod, it removes the choices to save the surrendering bandit, as well as the young fleeing troll. Does anyone know why that is the case, if MC is playing with the good guy choice enabled in the mod?
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
It's not that the mod default removes choices ... there's "path" settings: one is "good guy" one is "bad guy" ... I don't know if that was based on what the code says or what the modder decided for simplicity, but choices are only removed if you turn on one or the other. If you leave them both off, all choices are available.Hard to say why maker of WT mod removed the option for those, since so far there's no bad consequences for them. Only different story directions.
Well, after reading this....I don't feel so bad.It's not that the mod default removes choices ... there's "path" settings: one is "good guy" one is "bad guy" ... I don't know if that was based on what the code says or what the modder decided for simplicity, but choices are only removed if you turn on one or the other. If you leave them both off, all choices are available.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
He is male, and his default name is Saber.Is the white tiger a female or male?
Or should I just name it Pat?![]()
For me, it's not whether the act is a good idea or a bad idea, it's just that there seemed to be a theme as to what TYPE of acts counted one way, and what counted the other way, and that act seems to go against that trend (this is all about behind-the-curtain stuff of course).Well, after reading this....I don't feel so bad.
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
I named him Toonces.no bruh go for the gap moe name him "puddles"or "fluffy"
later in combat the mc will say "rip him to sherds puddles" *ferocious tiger rips enemy to shreds*
*random bystander to a other* "not what i expected when i heard puddles"
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Hopefully its a female troll and we can defeat and subdue her and then fuck her in the forest and have some troll babies .As for the Troll, the payoff is far away...but will be there, one way ot another.
You already saw what mama troll looked like, so if that floats your boat, go for itHopefully its a female troll and we can defeat and subdue her and then fuck her in the forest and have some troll babies .
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
As for the Troll, the payoff is far away...but will be there, one way ot another.
This is a fantasy world with D&D-style creatures (pre-upcoming version). That means TROPES of some creatures being naturally evil or aggressive to the point of requiring immediate action (like goblins, trolls, knolls, demons, etc.) are going to be part of the story. It also leaves open the possibility of having a story element that goes against the tropes, the surprisingly-peaceful ogre, the demon deserter that wants to play for your team (how can you trust them? How do they eventually prove themselves. Do they turn on you?), etc.I still don't see end means with the troll thing every example here doesn't make sens. My advice to dev is make it like a bear, neither good or evil just a dangerous wild animal that needs to be treated with caution and respect.
A bear would have defeated the point of the choice entirely. It is meant to be a difficult choice morally.I still don't see end means with the troll thing every example here doesn't make sens. My advice to dev is make it like a bear, neither good or evil just a dangerous wild animal that needs to be treated with caution and respect.
Also it's important to note, while some races are more bent on evil or good, that just mean the culture in general. Which means that there will be exceptions like lawful good Orcs or Chaotic Evil elves.A bear would have defeated the point of the choice entirely. It is meant to be a difficult choice morally.
Like Elhemeer rightly pointed out, in fantasy there is such things as an evil race.
Troll are such a race. Now, will the young one defy the expectations? Well, the readers will see, if they gave it the occasion. He could become an ally. He could become a threat.
Its a classic DnDesque moral dilemna.
Nope, some race are evil biologically. Plagueswarm, for example. Or Red Dragons.Also it's important to note, while some races are more bent on evil or good, that just mean the culture in general. Which means that there will be exceptions like lawful good Orcs or Chaotic Evil elves.
i mean this could be said for any sentient beingAlso it's important to note, while some races are more bent on evil or good, that just mean the culture in general. Which means that there will be exceptions like lawful good Orcs or Chaotic Evil elves.