origami367
Newbie
- Oct 10, 2019
- 47
- 17
- 158
You must be registered to see the links
Is this a false alarm?
JiangminBackdoor.Generic.bsyt
VBA32BScope.Trojan.ClipBanker
Thank you for the clear response. I think Anabel's character would benefit from being more dynamic. People can change dramatically for all kinds of reasons. But you seem to be set on Anabel being static. I will agree to disagree on this little matter. No big issues here.Anabel has stated throughout the entire story she doesn't want this. You can already slip her some Joy or Lebo if you decide to sabotage her. And as expected she doesn't like it. It would be totally against her character to say "oh hey, thanks for drugging me and getting me raped, it was fun."
I was under the impression that in order to keep pressure on Sammy, financial troubles would be expanded upon with more money sinks. Based on this part of your response here, are we to assume the source of challenge is going to shift from money to something else later in the game? Are you willing to elaborate on that?The same with Oskar, he was always planned to die, the Dani route is just one version of it. Early game, the stress of rent is meant to push the player into agreeing to things they may not want to. A virgin run Sammy wont agree to a blowjob in the pub unless there is some motivation. But later game when money becomes less of an issue, rent becomes a chore. So Oskar needs to be removed.
can we get them...a BIT bigger tho? just not stupid sized.Biggest you can see in the images on the front page. No stupid sized ones in the game and never will be.
I mean, I'd really like that too, but this is a game with tons of clothes, which makes adding body types a huge pain, and it doesn't add much to the main draws of the game - corruption and adventuring. If it were my game I'd add them, but then it'd be a different game, you know?can we get them...a BIT bigger tho? just not stupid sized.
like atleast close to Christina Hendricks![]()
That's oddly specific.this game somehow manages to perfectly capture the jaded depravity of a 40 year old hooker who could have retired years ago but didn't because she likes it.
*Googling* Come on, how big could that be- WOWZA PALOOZAcan we get them...a BIT bigger tho? just not stupid sized.
like atleast close to Christina Hendricks![]()
The issue is that it'd take a LONG time to get the increased size in with nothing else added. There's a reason that almost all the scenes are either nude or have limited potential outfits going into them. Each additional variant you add in adds another set of art to make. For an outfit that means you just need to add 1 new set of images per scene that can show it. For alternative body sizes you'd need to have a new piece of art for every scene that shows the breasts / butt for every outfit the scene can use. Frankly, there's always going to be someone complaining about their preferred breast / butt /whatever not being in the game. I know I'd personally prefer to see more game content and not have to wait months for the next body size and nothing else edition of the game.can we get them...a BIT bigger tho? just not stupid sized.
like atleast close to Christina Hendricks![]()
Even though I removed the "Danger Limit" and enabled "Dangerous Days," the school bullies didn't pose much of a problem. Virtual street thugs (virtual because you can't see them) are much more dangerous. I ended up giving Cassidy the option to kill the bullies simply because I didn't like seeing her suffer.Characters like the bullies purpose is to create some early game troubles before you have settled into the game and "made" your character. Once you are deeper into the game and settled, their purpose is lost and so need to be removed.
It would be cool if they can move together but just to remind you there are others roommates already planned including Emile.I still wish I could have Dani move in with Sammy. Her staying in that closet is just sad.![]()
FYI, that's a common belief (that addiction is always permanent), and recovery groups like AA and NA swear by it, but it'sIt was something that was mentioned to me when I added the Addict origin and it makes sense. I didn't have time to look into it then but will see now this update is out.
Your link is to an opinion piece, and shouldn't be treated as anything more than that. Also, if you had actually read it, you'd realize it doesn't support your claim that addiction may not be permanent. The author is saying he thinks people may be more prone to certain types of addiction over others.FYI, that's a common belief (that addiction is always permanent), and recovery groups like AA and NA swear by it, but it'sYou must be registered to see the links.
I got an interesting bug with version 0.3.5.01
I was in the VIP party drinking and even agree to have fun with a guy. When we arrived to a bedroom instead of having sex my was like she was going to throw up and claimed she couldn't do it. She ended outside on Revel street. The bug was when i returned to the party where i got the chat with Theo again and the money too.
I happened to get this once again today. I understand how it works better.I don't remember adding in an event where she pukes. Can you give more details?
Infinite money glitch?The bug happen if you decide to return to the party. You get the conversation with Theo and the money again.
Infinite i don't think so because it require a reason for Sammy to leave the party and return...Infinite money glitch?![]()
Fine, whatever, but if I hear characters start spouting AA speak I'm uninstalling and never looking back. That was my whole point, really.Your link is to an opinion piece, and shouldn't be treated as anything more than that. Also, if you had actually read it, you'd realize it doesn't support your claim that addiction may not be permanent. The author is saying he thinks people may be more prone to certain types of addiction over others.
Science and medical definitions are fluid. They change as our understanding of the world changes. Not everyone agrees, and so they write opinion pieces like that to make their cases for a different perspective over the present one. Unless there is overwhelming evidence to support a change, it's best to stick with the overall scientific and medical consensus.
Addiction comes with cravings and triggers which are considered chronic symptoms which must be managed. Something that is chronic lasts a very long time, at best; forever at worst. This is why a former alcoholic is recognized as a "recovering alcoholic" for the rest of their life in medical practice and recovery communities.
A person is considered "cured" of something when the matter is no longer present. Sometimes it may even be impossible for the issue to return. When a person gets the flu, they are cured when the infection is no longer present.
Additionally, they can no longer get that strain of the flu ever again. If they ever get the flu again, it will be a different strain, and there is usually a new strain every year. This is why flu shots are annual.
If addiction was curable, like the flu, then a former addict would no longer feel cravings again, and no longer require management skills or support communities. They would be immune to relapse. It should be obvious how absurd this idea is.
While it is true many recovering addicts can live the rest of their life and never relapse, but the chance of relapse is never zero. A former addict may not feel cravings after a long time, but that doesn't mean they are cured of addiction. It is more likely the case their management skills have become second nature and/or their support network is effective.