- Aug 27, 2016
- 43
- 24
Do you know if you'll at least be able to get nude sprites for all of the characters? Personally sprites + text would make it perfect.
Dude, I get what you're saying but loli material is definitely illegal in the US.Thanks for your input.
As far as images for scenes . . . it is a possibility in the future. The problem is that I am not an artist, so all such images would need to be commissioned. Blargsnarf is willing to do the occasional pro-bono image, but has to dedicate most of his time to working on paying stuff (which is why the image of Lincoln is the only image from him so far.) If my financial situation improves I'll be commissioning him for artwork for the game, but that might be a while.
As far as Nick suing is concerned . . . that can only really happen until I replace all content from the show with original art. At that point it's parody and covered under the fair use policy of copyright law.
As far as changing the ages of characters in the show . . . I will not do that. It is NOT "**********". I hate that people can't seem to tell the difference between lolicon / shotacon (which hurts no one) and child pornography (which is damaging to the children involved). I know that loli / shota material is illegal in some countries, but I am in the US where it is (more or less) legal. On top of it all, even if I wanted to change the characters' ages (which I do not) the amount of custom art required would be prohibitively large.
You realize this is a 7 year old article right? If it's not a real child in the picture, video, or game it's not illegal.Dude, I get what you're saying but loli material is definitely illegal in the US.
You must be registered to see the links
Incorrect. Pornography including minors is protected by the First Amendment speech unless it includes the depiction is of a real child / victim as a result of photographing a live performance or anything along those lines.Dude, I get what you're saying but loli material is definitely illegal in the US.
You must be registered to see the links
Except a guy literally went to jail under federal law for importing Japanese lolicon material. And the laws that put him in jail have not been changed.Incorrect. Pornography including minors is protected by the First Amendment speech unless it includes the depiction is of a real child / victim as a result of photographing a live performance or anything along those lines.
Except that this was decided by the supreme court which is the highest tier in the justice department.Except a guy literally went to jail under federal law for importing Japanese lolicon material. And the laws that put him in jail have not been changed.
Really? Tell me moreWhy is this even such an issue? I mean, that Incest House/Family/MILF Quest guy exclusively has like 10-13 year old boys as protagonists who rape their moms. That's 10x worse legally than whatever this is.
I don't think the main character is that young but thanks regardlessYou must be registered to see the links
"All characters depicted are above 18"You must be registered to see the links
That case was in 2002, before the current law was passed and before Handley went to jail.Except that this was decided by the supreme court which is the highest tier in the justice department.
Consult: Ashcroft v. Free Speech CoalitionAshcroft v. Free Speech Coalition
The supreme court found that the CPPA was facially invalid in prohibiting virtual or cartoon child pornography.