ename144
Engaged Member
- Sep 20, 2018
- 3,739
- 15,524
- 681
That sounds great, but what would happen in that case is exactly what happened with Linnae: she tried to keep things on track but was largely ignored, then quit as soon as the going got tough. You can't fake charisma any more than you can intelligence.Neither is easy to teach but judgement is far harder as it relies more on your natural instincts and deduction abilities.
And of course, it is more likely because the 'strong leader' is more likely to push themselves into a position where they have control over other people rather than the one with the actual skills to anticipate shit and deduce the best course of action, but it doesn't mean that it's the optimal way to do things.
How many times throughout mankind have we seen people in position of leadership that decides to complete ignore their MUCH more intelligent advisors and do dumb shit? Quite a lot, mainly because if you lack judgement as a leader, you can't even tell that what you're doing is a dumb idea.
This is the basis of my argument as to why someone with a natural sense of judgement is better to have in that position to begin with, given that you can always fake confidence but you can't fake intelligence.
Putting a person with sound judgement but no leadership skills in charge of an organization will minimize the risk of said organization doing something stupid (at least in the short term), but only by maximizing the change that it won't be doing much of anything at all. To me that's still a fail state, even if it's technically better than letting a charismatic madman instigate a catastrophe. If you want a positive outcome, you need to take a chance on someone who can get things done. IMHO.