CREATE YOUR AI CUM SLUT ON CANDY.AI TRY FOR FREE
x

88stanford88

Engaged Member
Aug 12, 2022
2,320
2,545
This is not realistic!
Definitely the amulet and the necklace Stacy wears around her neck is part of the "fantasy tag" that strangely isn't in the thread...
for the rest:
cuckold husbands,
unfaithful wives,
office colleagues who invite you to lunch and then passing by the toilet pissing on the wife...
... or others who grope her ass...
or work colleagues who as a second job do webcam girl...
girls who fucks with dogs
...men who offer to husbands jobs if his beautiful wife goes to their private parties,,,.
well ... yes, except for the magic crystal ...
everything else to me seems pretty close to what happens in the big city on a daily basis
 

Buffalo Fred

Active Member
Aug 5, 2016
934
988
Other than the dev: no.
The version number MIGHT be an indicator but there is no rule it has to stop or bei completed at 1.0.
Yeah I was more thinking of the wording in the changelog: " There is a hard ending after you've reached three milestone enchantments "
But that might just be a phrasing issue.
 

TheUberstuff

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2020
1,260
1,667
Maybe some, but Happy Hookers that love to fuck everything in sight get boring fast.
yes they do, however I think in this case if she were to say hate what she was doing or at least dislike it but feel forced into it it would work better then fucking some people at work but not everyone. That does seem to me to make it annoying, either she is the office slut or she isn't.
 
  • Like
Reactions: doneladio

M.Voigt

Newbie
Jul 25, 2018
81
71
Hi,
I looked here but couldn't find an answer.
I don't now why, but the animations are not working, they don't load, do you know how to fix this?
I have the latest version installed and started the game from the beggining.
 
Last edited:

88stanford88

Engaged Member
Aug 12, 2022
2,320
2,545
There's also no rule that 0.99 has to be the final non-completed version - 0.100, 0.101 etc. are all valid
From a mathematical point of view this numbering is completely wrong...because 0.99 + 01 = 1.00 but still the versions can continue to be incomplete .. so then there will be version 1.01 1.02 and so on..
0.99 is a centesimal scale value ... it cannot become millesimal. --- to be correct your idea this version should have been 0.09 the next 0.091 and the previous 0.089
because the previous was 0.87 or 0.89... (and was not 0.089 or whatever)
Screenshot 2024-01-26 at 11.56.10.jpg
I have a lot of versions in my archive:D
Btw it is true that there is no rule that says that version 1.00 has to be the last one ... there are that complete games at version 1.2 for example GGGB
 
Last edited:

michaelcros

Member
Modder
Jul 22, 2020
403
1,875
From a mathematical point of view this numbering is completely wrong...because 0.99 + 01 = 1.00 but still the versions can continue to be incomplete .. so then there will be version 1.01 1.02 and so on..
0.99 is a centesimal scale value ... it cannot become millesimal. --- to be correct your idea this version should have been 0.09 the next 0.091 and the previous 0.089
because the previous was 0.87 or 0.89... (and was not 0.089 or whatever)
View attachment 3296841
I have a lot of versions in my archive:D
Btw it is true that there is no rule that says that version 1.00 has to be the last one ... there are that complete games at version 1.2 for example GGGB
The version identifier for software such as 0.99 is not a number, it is a Semantic Version:

"0.99" does not mean the literal number 0.99, it means Major version = 0 (i.e. not complete), Minor version = 99. (You can also get a third number, a patch version, so you can have "0.99.1" which would mean there is no new content, but there can be bug fixes, such as my 0.90.1 release here). This is why 0.100 can follow 0.99: we are adding 1 to the minor version, not adding 0.01 to some arbitrary number.

What 1.2 means is that there there are 2 releases with new content on a 1.0 release, not that it is "0.2" higher.
 

TheUberstuff

Well-Known Member
Jul 28, 2020
1,260
1,667
The version identifier for software such as 0.99 is not a number, it is a Semantic Version:

"0.99" does not mean the literal number 0.99, it means Major version = 0 (i.e. not complete), Minor version = 99. (You can also get a third number, a patch version, so you can have "0.99.1" which would mean there is no new content, but there can be bug fixes, such as my 0.90.1 release here). This is why 0.100 can follow 0.99: we are adding 1 to the minor version, not adding 0.01 to some arbitrary number.

What 1.2 means is that there there are 2 releases with new content on a 1.0 release, not that it is "0.2" higher.
I mean I doubt most people understand/know that so why if you want to have your audience know whats going on would you put it in such a confusing way.?
 

88stanford88

Engaged Member
Aug 12, 2022
2,320
2,545
The version identifier for software such as 0.99 is not a number, it is a Semantic Version:

"0.99" does not mean the literal number 0.99, it means Major version = 0 (i.e. not complete), Minor version = 99. (You can also get a third number, a patch version, so you can have "0.99.1" which would mean there is no new content, but there can be bug fixes, such as my 0.90.1 release here). This is why 0.100 can follow 0.99: we are adding 1 to the minor version, not adding 0.01 to some arbitrary number.

What 1.2 means is that there there are 2 releases with new content on a 1.0 release, not that it is "0.2" higher.
Numbers are math-not semantics
and in fact I had specified it well in the previous post...
all versions of all programs follow a mathematical order... in the computer world.. just check Operating System versions

Math is not an opinion and for semantic you can just add more words to specify the semantic part of the update...
in fact some people add DLC or they put a subtitle to each update...
if you want to be semantic clearly you have to use chapter 1 chapter 2 etc. etc.
after having 0.99 versions using 0.100 is totally wrong because numbers are math!

But of course you are free to be wrong by using number as semantical meaning :cool:
I have discussed this also with Decent Monkie FB developer.. he is now using numbers correctly... but he was wrong too (after 0.9 he goes to version 0.10 and this was wrong mathematically)
 
Last edited:

88stanford88

Engaged Member
Aug 12, 2022
2,320
2,545
There's also no rule that 0.99 has to be the final non-completed version - 0.100, 0.101 etc. are all valid
this are not valid
maybe 0.99.1 is valid
but if you go for version 0.10.1 this would be wrong also semantically... because version 0.10 was one of the initial versions!
in any case
as you can see after version 0.99 is not possible create a 0.10.0
 

88stanford88

Engaged Member
Aug 12, 2022
2,320
2,545
you could not be more wrong, sry but version numbers are not math
and why after windows 10.x there was Windows 11?.. and numerical version progression is based on math!
in any cases I'm just saying that numbers ARE MATH! Are they?
 
4.00 star(s) 107 Votes