Collection Mod Others The Sims 4: NSFW Modding

[Curious Kitty]

View attachment 1085706

Just enforces the point,

So basically Wickedwhims file checker detected SC4L and alerted itself to the exact file it sought to restrict,
Like a false positive
Just a blunder and not worth the hype,
We had drama with this back with some dude called Art.www or something like that a while ago, obviously people who use the mods get sore but unfortunately its between the modders to sort it between themselves

 

[LordVoldemort24]

With all due respect, That's a little misleading... he obviously put in a code to block S4CL because its being used to inject things into Wickedwhims that he doesn't want to be tied to, eg pets, rape and at one point in the past kids,
Modders have taken steps to block other modders from editing their mods and code in the past so this nothing new, especially when others seek to earn cash or rep from it,
Its drama I know but stolen code etc is hard to overlook x

The bottom line is that this is not malware and will not harm your setup, its going to be a code somewhere that blocks other codes from being accessible in some way

None of my mods modify Wicked Whims in any way. Everyone continues saying I "stole code", but noone has provided any proof (Not even to me), please stop spreading this baseless rumor as if it were a fact.

Malware by definition is, according to google, "Software that is specifically designed to disrupt, damage, or gain unauthorized access to a computer system. ", Mods are a part of the computer system, especially when they are running alongside The Sims 4.

Furthermore, what he has done is against the EA User Agreement:

Interfere with or disrupt another player's use of an EA Service. This includes disrupting the normal flow of game play, chat or dialogue within an EA Service by, for example, using vulgar or harassing language, being abusive, excessive shouting (all caps), spamming, flooding or hitting the return key repeatedly.

Just enforces the point,

So basically Wickedwhims file checker detected SC4L and alerted itself to the exact file it sought to restrict,
Like a false positive
Just a blunder and not worth the hype,
We had drama with this back with some dude called Art.www or something like that a while ago, obviously people who use the mods get sore but unfortunately its between the modders to sort it between themselves

Your idea of "let the modders sort it out" is flawed, especially when one modder is banned without reason from literally everywhere due to slander from the other party. It makes it difficult to defend any attacks thrown against them when they can't put up a defense in the first place due to being banned.

 

[Deleted member 2065271]

So basically anyone outside of the elitist group of privilaged modders will be degraded and banned from servers for providing competition/variation to the game... Generally speaking and seeing it from a third person perspective would discourage any new scripters from starting up. Doesn't discourage me though, btw code cannot be "stolen" when all of it belongs to EA in the first place AND we scripters are "stealing" EA's code by decompiling it and using it in our mods in the same manner anyone else would by decompiling modder scripts and using it. The ONLY shitty actions one could make here would be to take credit for ANY code EA's and modders alike and claim it is their own. Anything else is a bunch of bullshit talk and false claims

 

[Curious Kitty]

Doesn't matter how its worded, if someone doesn't want to be associated then can't be helped, pets and rape isn't everyone's bag but its a users choice what they play with, it's a modders choice too I guess

 

[LordVoldemort24]

Doesn't matter how its worded, if someone doesn't want to be associated then can't be helped, pets and rape isn't everyone's bag but its a users choice what they play with, it's a modders choice too I guess

I don't even play The Sims 4, I only make mods for it. My mods are community driven. All planned features and current features were requested by the community and were made for the community. Trying to attack a mod for including features requested by the community essentially means you are attacking the community that requested those features as well.

I do have some lines drawn though, and I do decline some feature requests. For example, I don't plan on ever adding the ability to kidnap or enslave Child Sims via Sim Snatcher, but I've received quite a few requests for it.

 

[Curious Kitty]

I don't even play The Sims 4, I only make mods for it. My mods are community driven. All planned features and current features were requested by the community and were made for the community. Trying to attack a mod for including features requested by the community essentially means you are attacking the community that requested those features as well.

I respect all of that and I know you enabled something that was highly requested,
Unfortunately its impossible to sidestep the white knight agendas that come with such content, I learned a long time ago to stop being concerned personally but same time I guess authors need to appease their own communites,
its just not right to freak people out over a malware warning which isn't actually a virus and start another flame war which won't help either party

 

[LordVoldemort24]

I respect all of that and I know you enabled something that was highly requested,
Unfortunately its impossible to sidestep the white knight agendas that come with such content, I learned a long time ago to stop being concerned personally but same time I guess authors need to appease their own communites,
its just not right to freak people out over a malware warning which isn't actually a virus and start another flame war which won't help either party

My only goal was for Turbo to remove the malicious code. No, I do not recommend personally attacking them, since that was never my intention. I wanted people to be aware of the problem so it could eventually reach the ears of Turbo himself.

I agree that such a warning, and how poorly it was worded, from within a mod was not the way to go about informing users, which is why I removed it soon after uploading the version that contained it, with the hope that not many people saw that warning in their game.

The malicious code was removed from Wicked Whims by Turbodriver, so I am content and wish no further discussion on the topic. Since the only form of available communication with Turbo was through the community, I can only hope the community can move on from this and don't decide to personally attack him. Noone wants to see Wicked Whims break other mods intentionally, but noone wants to see it die either.

 

[Jorak84]

Still I don't see the term "malware" is used correctly as it doesn't harm my PC and just blocks code from a mod. Personally I wouldn't call this malware but kindergarten.
Malware is just a good "PR" term here to have folks do what they do best these days...being offended as fuck without thinking.

 

[LordVoldemort24]

Still I don't see the term "malware" is used correctly as it doesn't harm my PC and just blocks code from a mod. Personally I wouldn't call this malware but kindergarten.
Malware is just a good "PR" term here to have folks do what they do best these days...being offended as fuck without thinking.

I couldn't think of a better word than that. What word would you use instead?

 

[HeliosPirate]

what is S4CL? also, what is the latest known safe version?

S4CL is sims 4 community library. Tbh I use this mod only for the sliders mods so well if he blocks it just because I want sliders in my game I don't know what to say. Since when he's the police?

 

[taglag]

I do not see how you can support anyone building a mod in such a way that it maliciously sabotages other mods.

If you support such actions where does it stop, what is the next mod that they decide "well I need to sabotage that one as well ".

Maybe they decide a clothing mod does not suit them,(Its just to lewd) or maybe Nisa Perveted Whims is next, or maybe they decide to sabotage Basemental drugs... Where does it stop.

You intend for one person to decide which mods are okay and which are not, making all your mindless choices for you, and you defend them.

I don't want one man or woman deciding this or that for me. Let them make mods, and let me chose the ones I like. They have no business destroying other peoples hard work.

I mean how would you like building something special in your back yard only to find out during the night your neighbor in the middle of the night destroyed it. It is as wrong as any malicious virus I have ever seen, and I think totally heinous.

 

[SweetBlueberry]

WickedWhims v165.5 (15.03.2021)

You must be registered to see the links

Spoiler: Changelog

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

This version is clean of the malwere that was commented?

 

[maksimko12]

This version is clean of the malwere that was commented?

Nothing is said about this.

 

[duchamp]

Lifeline Animations now available
Includes: Fuck Fest (Stages 5-6), Category Anal on Floor
Monkey Bar Threesome (Stages 1, 2 and Climax), Category V-A-C on Monkey Bars
DOWNLOAD:

You must be registered to see the links

Spoiler: GIFs

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[docteure]

I don't remember how it started, but I remember a few weeks ago YouTubers posted news that an adult mod (referring to CL's mod), which actually exists for long ago, only came to be known to the public at that time. And the thumbnail of the posts refers to WW mod.

As you can imagine, people not familiar with WW blamed him for supporting child pornography, bestiality, rape, etc etc. Later on it was corrected that it is actually CL's mod, but the damage was done. Of course, to clear his name, WW does not want anything to do with CL, and as a modder myself (though for other games), I completely understand.

The public was (or, is) furious about the fact of child pornography and bestiality in CL's mod. I'm not saying that rape is not important, but those two contents are highly regarded as so wrong on so many levels for public opinion.

I don't think CL will remove said contents, but if he does (only leaving BDSM and nonconsent contents intact), I think it will become more acceptable?
These are just my own opinion anyway.

 

[maksimko12]

RedAppleNet 1.3.0 (11.03.2021)

You must be registered to see the links

Spoiler: Changelog

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.

 

[docteure]

If you mean CN, he doesn't have ** in any of his mods. Animals are another thing, but games like Skyrim and Fallout have had critter stuff going on for as long as I've known them with no backlash that I've seen, probably because the Sims is more mainstream. My thing is, it's better that people use the Sims for this than to do this stuff in real life, and CN doesn't condone the abuse of real life people, animals, etc.

Oh yeah sorry I meant CN.

Then can anyone explain why CN was banned from LoversLab (LL) twice?
LL revoked his first ban, as in the past, he did have child pornography content. It was well known to everyone in the community there. But LL wanted to give him a chance, hence the revoke.
I know very well that LL accepts BDSM, rape, and even bestiality.

I'm not as well aware as the reason for the second ban. But I do know that LL is now very vocal against child pornography.
And I can check with one of the LL admins myself as I've talked with said person several times.

Also just want to be clear, I'm not here to create another drama, I just want to point out that some people here misunderstand that the reasons for the hate were BDSM and rape. Well, they are but they're not the main fuel.

 

[docteure]

Also, the demographic of Sims 4 gamers and Bethesda (Skyrim, Fallout) gamers are different. You need to be aware that more than half of the Sims 4 gamers are women, which is in contrast with Bethesda games.
Men tend to accept bestiality, while women don't.

Also, the bestiality content in Skyrim and Fallout are for wildlife and monsters. In contrast with Sims 4, which are cute pets (cats and dogs). I'm against bestiality myself but if my opinion is disregarded, there is still quite a gap between these bestiality contents (scary vs cute), and you can't ignore this fact.

 

[docteure]

I said it was more mainstream, which was to say it attracts more people that aren't exposed to degenerate shit on the regular whether it be casual gamers, women, or whatever. My point in commenting is that there is no association between CN's mods and child pornography in this moment in time, and making a casual association like that is slanderous, especially when he isn't the one responsible for making the current ** mods that were discussed in Pixelade's video.

If indeed there is no ** content, then it's good. However, public opinion was already established that CN is involved in making ** and bestiality contents, which are not acceptable in the general community.

I don't intend to keep discussing this, so here is my last opinion if CN wants to clear his name especially regarding **:
CN needs to prove to the public that there are indeed no ** contents in his mod

Of course, he doesn't need to do this, but a statement in my opinion is better than keep being silent about it.

 

[mpkio2]

Hey guys!

CC links that are uploaded onto the "CC in General" google doc are not working - the website that the CC is uploaded to letupload.io recently had a server issue due to a fire at their base and, in effect, has caused the website to have issues, making downloads not work.

Is it possible that you guys are able to upload the CC content to a backup google doc (Uploaded onto a different hosting website,) so users can download stuff while the main one is saved until letsupload.io sort things out?