4.50 star(s) 16 Votes

Jakers15@

Active Member
Jan 3, 2023
542
1,344
257
Idea Extra - Same words, different meanings. Serenet plays with wordplay.

Serenet is sitting facing Olgrum, and behind her is Caelen, a little distance away. Caelen is telling them about a new mission: to kill a dragon. Serenet asks where the dragon is. Caelen replies that it's inside a cave at the top of a mountain. At that moment, Serenet, with a perverted look and an excited smile, says:

"Then we need to go into the cave and kill the dragon." Serenet and Olgrum's eyes meet. Olgrum understood the message.

Caelen says: "Yes."

However, what Caelen didn't realize is that, while they were talking, Serenet spread her legs, giving Olgrum a perfect view of her vagina and anus surrounded by pubic hair.

"Going into the cave" would be a double entendre. For Caelen, it was literal. For Olgrum, a figure of speech, meaning going into Serenet.


It's a very short idea that can be animated in 5 images. Comic relief.
 

Bob69

Uploading the World
Uploader
Donor
Compressor
Mar 2, 2019
24,162
333,680
998
Thorns Beneath the Wings [v0.10] [Aleksandr 14] - Compressed

Win/Linux [1,10 GB]
- - - -

Mac [1,09 GB]
- - - -

You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
 

Robin_Scales

Member
Feb 21, 2018
296
647
278
Right, what am I missing?
This game is sitting at 4.5 stars with a ton of reviews, which is crazy high for the Ntr-genre, which routinely gets spammed with negative reviews, with many of the greatest in the genre not even making 4.0.

And yet the art/renders look so... bad, imo. The kind of stuff that would not look out of place in a game at 2.8 stars, that got abandoned after 2 months. Bad lightning, bad bodily proportions, bad renders.

And yet, clearly there is SOMETHING here that draws people in. Is the writing great? Are the renders in the game better than the previews? Does it have actual interesting gameplay? What am I missing?

I would love nothing more than for this game to live up to its reviews, but I am pretty sceptical going off the artstyle.
 

Kekekerkek

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
1,385
1,033
348
Right, what am I missing?
This game is sitting at 4.5 stars with a ton of reviews, which is crazy high for the Ntr-genre, which routinely gets spammed with negative reviews, with many of the greatest in the genre not even making 4.0.

And yet the art/renders look so... bad, imo. The kind of stuff that would not look out of place in a game at 2.8 stars, that got abandoned after 2 months. Bad lightning, bad bodily proportions, bad renders.

And yet, clearly there is SOMETHING here that draws people in. Is the writing great? Are the renders in the game better than the previews? Does it have actual interesting gameplay? What am I missing?

I would love nothing more than for this game to live up to its reviews, but I am pretty sceptical going off the artstyle.
the artstyle is great, maybe it's just you who doesn't like it, in the end it's subjective
 
  • Like
Reactions: crisbr

Robin_Scales

Member
Feb 21, 2018
296
647
278
the artstyle is great, maybe it's just you who doesn't like it, in the end it's subjective
I suppose what you say about subjectivity is true
But is the artstyle really the primary thing that draws you, and this playerbase in?
I can usually see the appeal of most popular games, even when stuff isn't for me, but this time I am pretty confounded. And I tend to be a major Ntr-freak.
 

Kekekerkek

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
1,385
1,033
348
I suppose what you say about subjectivity is true
But is the artstyle really the primary thing that draws you, and this playerbase in?
I can usually see the appeal of most popular games, even when stuff isn't for me, but this time I am pretty confounded. And I tend to be a major Ntr-freak.
yeah i like the artstyle, it looks weird at first but in game it's fine
 
4.50 star(s) 16 Votes