-CookieMonster666-
Message Maven
- Nov 20, 2018
- 12,811
- 19,087
I see your point. And while I agree that "their actions are at least understandable", I would argue that people acting based on what they believe to be true is also understandable. Generally, people don't take actions without believing they are justified in one way or another — will bring them pleasure, are going to satisfy a need, will save them from danger, etc. So technically, real or not, it should be understandable that people will take actions, even if you don't agree with them or their reasoning.I would argue that the threat being real instead of fictitious matters quite a lot. Especially when they have proof of necromancy/magic existing. It's not that i'm arguing that they are good or that their methods are good, i'm just saying that their actions are at least understandable and in the setting somewhat acceptable, due to the threat they have. As i said, some times threats/crisis doesn't have good options to solve it, only bad and least bad option. That is also true in real life. Which also means i definitely am not faulting any hunters who after finishing their task, decides to retire and not return.
However, I strongly disagree with your premise that "in the setting [it's] somewhat acceptable". The Donner party was trapped in the Rocky Mountains and believed they would never be rescued and could never make it out to civilization again. All of the evidence they had seemed to suggest that was true. I don't think that makes their cannibalism (and murder, at one point) even remotely acceptable. So I can understand why they did it, but IMO that doesn't make it OK.
So, I guess agree to disagree. I'm guessing I won't convince you of my perspective. But I know for sure you're not going to change my opinion that the cult is led by some of the world's bigger pieces of shit. (Not nearly as bad as necromancers, obviously, but pretty damn high on the list to me.)
Excellent point. Is it actually about saving the world, or is that just an excuse to cling to their control over their brainwashed / heavily subdued people?There was a real threat -- to their fictitious power.