Some stats from the 18 lists above.
The 5 tiers coverts into 10, 7.5, 5, 2.5, 0, regardless some use S+ for the highest. And none of the 6 tiers list actually used the 6th tier for any LI.
Normalized point is done by considering the mean and standard deviation of each list.
| Average | Average of Normalized pointP | s.d. of the Normalized Point |
Jacky | 8.61 | 0.748 | 0.515 |
Alyvia | 8.33 | 0.594 | 0.701 |
Emily | 3.75 | -0.768 | 0.967 |
Cathrine | 6.39 | 0.00133 | 0.906 |
Stephanie | 7.78 | 0.540 | 0.884 |
Viktoria | 6.94 | 0.195 | 0.531 |
Clements | 8.75 | 0.804 | 0.599 |
Mya | 4.58 | -0.55 | 0.677 |
Julia | 7.22 | 0.356 | 0.497 |
Lola | 3.61 | -0.828 | 0.810 |
Abigail | 3.06 | -1.09 | 0.958 |
Both averages give the same result
Clements > Jacky > Alyvia > Stephanie> Julia > Viktoria > Cathrine > Mya > Emily > Lola > Abigail
s.d. (smaller the value means more consistence how people think about the girl)
Emily > Abigail > Cathrine > Stephanie> Lola > Alyvia > Mya > Clements > Viktoria > Jacky > Julia
Cathrine is the mid point, almost zero point after normalizing and averaging, but it is achieved by having people either hate her or love her a lot.
General trend is milf > young > FBI
Emily is most polarized, Milfs are very stable.
Sample size = 18 means these are bullshit, and I will say Stephanie is still the best girl