Retro Wave
Member
- Oct 24, 2021
 
- 153
 
- 129
 
- 143
 
Quite the optimist, aren't youNo come in 2027
Quite the optimist, aren't youNo come in 2027
They might have some remote scenes while she's away and probably back in 1-2 updates but would probably start with HJ/BJ as usual so I'd imagine 3-4 updates for actual Jacky action so 2027 seems pretty realistic tbhQuite the optimist, aren't you
Quite the optimist, aren't youThey might have some remote scenes while she's away and probably back in 1-2 updates but would probably start with HJ/BJ as usual so I'd imagine 3-4 updates for actual Jacky action so 2027 seems pretty realistic tbh
Oh come on, even with the changes to Emily, she is nowhere near Jacky or Mrs. Clements or even her sister or Steph. But if you want Loli-Characters, this is not the game for you, simple as that.Really not liking how the characters seem to be changing so much in proportions. I didn't mind that half the cast had giant tits at the beginning because there was a balance between them all with the sliding scale in between. Now they're all the same body type with the same features. I do like the teacher and Jacky but not every character should have the same measurements as women who already had multiple offspring. Milfs are great but over half the cast is nowhere near that territory so... why do they increase height and breast sizes every update?
I agree she isn't at Jacky levels yet but she has changed drastically and with the preview image she is even taller now. Compare her first scene to her last scenes and you can see that in a week she grew like the grinch's heart. It isn't just her though compare Vicky at the beginning to her scene where she increases in size once her clothing comes off. The game even says she has a C-cup and Emily has a B how on earth could that be true? In Emily's last scene she must have gone up 2 or 3 cups sizes. It isn't a love of loli characters its an aversion to every character having E+ breasts.Oh come on, even with the changes to Emily, she is nowhere near Jacky or Mrs. Clements or even her sister or Steph. But if you want Loli-Characters, this is not the game for you, simple as that.
Can I ask you something? What did you see when you looked at the previews for the game? Or what did you see in the banner for this thread? Because what I saw was a lot of girls with watermelon-sized breasts, and I knew that this game has a specific theme and kinks. I knew that the author liked busty women, and I was all for it.It isn't a love of loli characters its an aversion to every character having E+ breasts.
I dont know, the Cup Sizes in the Bios are Nonsense IMO. Like, there is nothing like a 50B-Cup for example or 69K or whatever Alyvia is.I agree she isn't at Jacky levels yet but she has changed drastically and with the preview image she is even taller now. Compare her first scene to her last scenes and you can see that in a week she grew like the grinch's heart. It isn't just her though compare Vicky at the beginning to her scene where she increases in size once her clothing comes off. The game even says she has a C-cup and Emily has a B how on earth could that be true? In Emily's last scene she must have gone up 2 or 3 cups sizes. It isn't a love of loli characters its an aversion to every character having E+ breasts.
It will only be netori. Thankfully.When do they add NTR to the game?
You're kidding, right? Emily was absolutely supposed to be a loli. BaiBai may have decided to change that, to a greater or lesser extent, but it's indisputable that she was intended to be a loli. I mean, look at her;And well, while she certainly has grown and also her breasts have grown, she was never supposed to be a Loli.
So he says, and I imagine there's even some degree of truth to that, but I'd argue his primary reason for the change was to move away from elements of the game which might get him removed from platforms because of the demands of payment processsors.And the height increase of her (and MC) was because those made problems and a lot of extra work in scenes.
I only repeat what BaiBai has said (including that she was never supposed to be a Loli). And if he has other reasons to change her appearance, so be it, I dont really care. It his game after all.You're kidding, right? Emily was absolutely supposed to be a loli. BaiBai may have decided to change that, to a greater or lesser extent, but it's indisputable that she was intended to be a loli. I mean, look at her;
View attachment 5309612
View attachment 5309613
So he says, and I imagine there's even some degree of truth to that, but I'd argue his primary reason for the change was to move away from elements of the game which might get him removed from platforms because of the demands of payment processsors.
So we can't do both? If we pay we're banned from here?Not as if they are paying anyway, because if they would be paying, they would not voice their concerns on the piracy site, but rather on Subscribestar.
Am I the idiot? Because I played version 0.9 not long after it was released here last year (not talking about 0.9b, which came later with fixes, but the original 0.9), and I noticed Emily's changes in the last scene right away, so I took a couple of screenshots of her in the same place, one from before and one from after, and asked Baibai about it (her height in the previews actually matches her height in her last gallery scene). That scene was like a year ago; the payment processors panic started like two or three months ago with the fall of itch.io and Steam.So he says, and I imagine there's even some degree of truth to that, but I'd argue his primary reason for the change was to move away from elements of the game which might get him removed from platforms because of the demands of payment processsors.
The most recent round of payment processor bans were two or three months ago. But those weren't the only ones, nor were they the first time payment processors have tried to leverage their demands, they're just the most recent example. I don't think you're an idiot for only thinking about the recent ones and not being aware of previous instances, so don't be so hard on yourself.That scene was like a year ago; the payment processors panic started like two or three months ago with the fall of itch.io and Steam.
I don't think you do know what I'm saying, actually. I'm saying that he has changed several things in the game, including Emily's appearance, out of concern that his game would be banned, and that such a concern existed in the past, as well as the present. That's not "using present problems to justify past changes", that's pointing out that the changes in the past were due to concerns in the past, and those concerns are not only still present today, but have in fact increased.I know what you are trying to say, but be consistent; don't use present problems to try to justify past changes.
By his own admission, he did in fact intend to do that after the recent round of Itch.io bans, but I never said he intended that in his earler changes, no. His earlier changes were more about changing the apparent age of several characters, most notably Emily and the MC (both of who have grown a full foot or so in height over the course of a few in-game days). The non-incest stuff is his more recent concern, though the other concern is still present.So, are you saying that Baibai, the Baibai that panicked and wanted to make a non-incest version of the game when he heard of the banning
Nope. Games being banned for various reasons have occured more than once, and prior to the instances a few months ago; his reacting to it when it happened a year ago is not "knowing it'll happen in a year", exactly, but you could say it's awareness of an ongoing pattern, I suppose.knew for a year what was going to happen
No. I'm saying he made some small changes which he hoped would be enough to insulate him from being banned for "Reason X", then worried that they wouldn't be enough, and made more changes (still for "Reason X"), and considered making vastly more drastic changes after the recent bans (mostly for "Reason Z"). Which, y'know... he very clearly did do, just a couple of months ago.changed the heights of the characters but not enough to avoid the payment processors ban hammer so he could panic again later when it happened and start planning to change the models heights even more while also removing more things to appease the payment processor?
He also included a "Skip Loli Content" option in his game, and it only affects Emily's scenes. So he may well have said that, but I'd argue he's being, at best, disingenuous. He may well have changed his mind since then, as is his right, but pretending it was never intended is absurd.I only repeat what BaiBai has said (including that she was never supposed to be a Loli).
Absolutely it's his game, and I think you'll note I haven't expressed dissatisfaction with his decision to change her appearance.And if he has other reasons to change her appearance, so be it, I dont really care. It his game after all.
You know what, I'm probably not the right person to discuss this with since I found this game in 0.7, I think, so I don't know how Baibai was before that.The most recent round of payment processor bans were two or three months ago. But those weren't the only ones, nor were they the first time payment processors have tried to leverage their demands, they're just the most recent example. I don't think you're an idiot for only thinking about the recent ones and not being aware of previous instances, so don't be so hard on yourself.
I don't think you do know what I'm saying, actually. I'm saying that he has changed several things in the game, including Emily's appearance, out of concern that his game would be banned, and that such a concern existed in the past, as well as the present. That's not "using present problems to justify past changes", that's pointing out that the changes in the past were due to concerns in the past, and those concerns are not only still present today, but have in fact increased.
By his own admission, he did in fact intend to do that after the recent round of Itch.io bans, but I never said he intended that in his earler changes, no. His earlier changes were more about changing the apparent age of several characters, most notably Emily and the MC (both of who have grown a full foot or so in height over the course of a few in-game days). The non-incest stuff is his more recent concern, though the other concern is still present.
Nope. Games being banned for various reasons have occured more than once, and prior to the instances a few months ago; his reacting to it when it happened a year ago is not "knowing it'll happen in a year", exactly, but you could say it's awareness of an ongoing pattern, I suppose.
No. I'm saying he made some small changes which he hoped would be enough to insulate him from being banned for "Reason X", then worried that they wouldn't be enough, and made more changes (still for "Reason X"), and considered making vastly more drastic changes after the recent bans (mostly for "Reason Z"). Which, y'know... he very clearly did do, just a couple of months ago.