It would help to make current version more "stable" if u compress in both version at same settings (if possible) and say what u think become worse (speed/size/not works/etc.) coz for now I dont's see any problems even if using hiding feature.In total for compress without experimental in continue using 2.0.3 and Awaiting for 2.1/2.2 stable in future
Both versions compress in general the same, and most of the changes in 2.1 do not make sense in my case, also all functions of 2.0.x are fully tested and you can get errors less often than in 2.1. And the function of donor and profiles loses its meaning in most cases after the function to manually compress video which pauses compression better than the basic pause function. For me, there is no difference in the fact that cwebp or Pingo is the same thing. And compressing videos is relevant only when there are not many of them, when there are a lot of them, it is a transformation into CJ.It would help to make current version more "stable" if u compress in both version at same settings (if possible) and say what u think become worse (speed/size/not works/etc.) coz for now I dont's see any problems even if using hiding feature.
https://f95zone.to/threads/iris-in-labyrinth-of-demons-v0723-the-craftsman.55229/page-26 Maybe i'm too stupid for understanding how compress this with new adobe flash compress function.
I didn't downloaded mentioned games just checked file structure (on steamdb info site since games put on Steam) and most likely only 1st one is worth to compress if my guess is right that video in some ogv (in game it named .omv ) format and audio in ovk that has somemegalol Maestro maybe you have idea how compress this? https://f95zone.to/threads/rewrite-v3-01-final-visualarts-key.102726/ and this https://f95zone.to/threads/moero-chronicle-deluxe-edition-v1-0-15-compile-heart-idea-factory.47639/
I'm choose this,but after choose folder with Swf no images or audio compressed,in result only 1 jpeg file compressed.View attachment 2272015
But probably not best idea coz on ur PC it most likely would take a lot of time. For testing take some not very big swf file place in some empty folder and test compression time. So u could possible guess total compression time for all game by doing some simple math like [(game size) / (1 swf file size] * (1 swf file cmp time).
I didn't downloaded mentioned games just checked file structure (on steamdb info site since games put on Steam) and most likely only 1st one is worth to compress if my guess is right that video in some ogv format and audio in ovk that has someYou must be registered to see the linksthat could work in this case. 2nd game has 1 very big xwb audio file that is very hard to repack, pac files with images probably much easier target but it not worth as I've said earlier (in best case game would be only 40% smaller).
UAGC doesn't compress audio placed inside swf (at least yet) just images (or video if enabled but this game don't need it). What file did u choose - most likely it's some small audio swf with 1 image?I'm choose this,but after choose folder with Swf no images or audio compressed,in result only 1 jpeg file compressed.
el1_queenBee0 tested on this file and result only 1 jpeg file compressedUAGC doesn't compress audio placed inside swf (at least yet) just images (or video if enabled but this game don't need it). What file did u choose - most likely it's some small audio swf with 1 image?You must be registered to see the linksthat allows to view swf contens and that is used for importing. I've tested UAGC on this file "ebl1_queenBee0.swf" (about 50 Mb).
Should be 508 png + 508 jpg. Most likely u didn't installed Java SE 8 from main UAGC page...el1_queenBee0 tested on this file and result only 1 jpeg file compressed
Java interestingShould be 508 png + 508 jpg. Most likely u didn't installed Java SE 8 from main UAGC page...
Most likely possible but using donoring for images isn't very effective as I've said earlier coz it's most useful for videos, less for audio and least for images. And u also said before that with image donor with "Lust Hunter" didn't give u much speed up.it's Possible add donor function for rpgm vx ace,needed for this game more than 30k images? https://f95zone.to/threads/princess-conquest-v0-20-0-towerfag.602
Better didn't give much speed up than nothing and this first situation,when this function can be used. For video it's actual only for games compressed with uagc (in no one times),Audio actually only for games with tonn of audio (some games) in Total donor function it's for some situation and in mostly on practice for images,most better function compressed video manually that's maximum effective function for get resultMost likely possible but using donoring for images isn't very effective as I've said earlier coz it's most useful for videos, less for audio and least for images. And u also said before that with image donor with "Lust Hunter" didn't give u much speed up.
I think about video donor u has wrong opinion coz for it should not matter in what tool u did video compression for old game and u also posted here test results VP9 vs VP8 where VP9 + UAGC (even on 3-4 speed) was faster than VP8 + Movavi so in total manual comression (at least to VP8) is bad idea at all especially when u have much faster video donor feature.Better didn't give much speed up than nothing and this first situation,when this function can be used. For video it's actual only for games compressed with uagc (in no one times),Audio actually only for games with tonn of audio (some games) in Total donor function it's for some situation and in mostly on practice for images,most better function compressed video manually that's maximum effective function for get result
When i'm try donoring video from compression version Done by Another compressor,That's Function say no and take only img and audio. Compress with vp8 actually for ogv,mkv,avi because uagc still wast a lot of time on compressing this formats,too much more time than movavi.My test only actual for webm this format take a lot of time compress in summary and per this time still no info for ~time compressing this videos,in movavi that's time ~time implented in interface and this nice.I think about video donor u has wrong opinion coz for it should not matter in what tool u did video compression for old game and u also posted here test results VP9 vs VP8 where VP9 + UAGC (even on 3-4 speed) was faster than VP8 + Movavi so in total manual comression (at least to VP8) is bad idea at all especially when u have much faster video donor feature.
Strange, if u remember the game name then I could check it coz there were no such problems for me yet...When i'm try donoring video from compression version Done by Another compressor,That's Function say no and take only img and audio.