v2.0 is the alpha version.What's the difference between 1.6 ver and 0.2.0 ver?
v1.6 is the final product for retail sale.
v2.0 is the alpha version.What's the difference between 1.6 ver and 0.2.0 ver?
That's exactly the issue I have with these SJWs who imply as if shota/lolicons are the same as "being attracted to actual children".
Not to mention, the fact that not every shota/lolicons are attracted to the characters themselves but more to the act of them being sexually involved with someone way older than them which is basically age-difference fetish.
But regardless, these people will never see the difference between fantasy in fiction and reality.
Sjw's can't separate reality from fiction and therefore use it as an excuse to be toxic assholes.So how does getting aroused and stroking yourself to the image of a child different from being attracted to pictures of a child?
This is where I get lost.. if you like a female anime character having a body of a 10y/o boy does that mean you fancy a girl that has not been developed in the same way?
And how do you separate the two, like.. what type of girls are you interested in real life?
Depends on the person but to imply that they're a mutually exclusive thing is extremely dumb.if you could get off normally to a character designed to be male, you'd be gay or at least bi right?
Because one's a fictional thing made out of pixels and the other is an actual sentient being deserving of moral consideration?So how does being able to jerk off to a 3d model meant to resemble a child mean you aren't interested in children
what a shad, thanks you manAlmost forgot, i have cheated for having gold for the Herba tickets.
Enjoy.
Really weird that you just assumed people against lolis are all for shota stuff. I don’t like either, and the idea of jacking off to anything with a childlike character even if it’s fiction is absolutely disgusting to me. I genuinely can’t understand it.Man, so many people here fighting against the addition of lolis in this. Funny how hard it is for these people to seperate real life from fiction, these are probably the same people who think that violence in video games make people violent which has been proven false time and time again. Or maybe that guy playing GTA wants to be a mass murderer irl?
Just accept that the creator of UtW is going to put what he likes in his game and there isn't really much any of us can do about it. Just accept it and move on, play the game and skip the content that you don't like or don't play the game at all. There will be other games where you can be a shota fucking milfs, and if you don't have that kind of faith then make your own game.
I also can't understand these people's hypocrisy
Shota in game = good
Loli in game = bad "kill the pedos"
lol
Variety is the spice of life! Enjoy yourself a little with things you can't have in real life, morally ambiguous or otherwise. Get yourself some milf, gilf, dilf, shota, loli, bottom heavy, top heavy, bbw or whatever. A bit of everything to please everyone, don't harsh other people's mellow just because you don't like some skippable content.
If you actually read the responses above, you'd realize that OP is referring to the people who loves shota but for some reason creates a double standard when it's a loli.Really weird that you just assumed people against lolis are all for shota stuff.
Yet people like you are here, pirating and enjoying the game while pretending to be disgusted by it.I don’t like either, and the idea of jacking off to anything with a childlike character even if it’s fiction is absolutely disgusting to me. I genuinely can’t understand it.
Except you're still lewding a shota by inserting yourself in him.There is a big difference between self inserting as a shota protag and lewding a loli.
And a SHOTA isn't a literal representation of a little boy? The dishonesty with people like you are absolutely unreal.even if I don't like it it's far more acceptable than lolis, who are literal representation of a little girl.
That's just your perspective though, not every lolicons are attracted to the character just like not every shotacons are attracted by the character.lolis is basically getting aroused by a childish figure. Based on that I don't support any game with lolis in it, that's gross.
+ About the shota thing, when you play as a shota, you're not getting a boner from looking at the shota.
Well, no, I am not the one claiming there's some moral issue with it. To me, there's nothing creepy with getting off to whatever fictional shit you want as there's no actual person harmed by it.This thread devolved into people pointing at each other and screaming "you are creepier".
Hell everyone in this fucking forum is a degenerate, just accept this and fap to your creepy shit in peace
This genre is cursed it seemsThis thread is TOT all over again...
And a SHOTA isn't a literal representation of a little boy? The dishonesty with people like you are absolutely unreal.
That's just your perspective though, not every lolicons are attracted to the character just like not every shotacons are attracted by the character.
To half the people with such fetish, it's more about the age-difference, you don't have to hide inside a closet pretending that you don't like this anime kid fucking those milfs by making excuses like "oh, I am the MC, MC is 1000+years old so adult, I don't get a boner from the MC".
Doesn't matter if you're not aroused by the character themselves, it's about getting aroused by the act of the depiction of a KID fucking a MILF which is basically getting a boner from "depiction of pedophilia" which you're being intentionally ignorant to since you basically are claiming "loli=pedo" but you don't like it when your own logic is used against you on a fetish that you like.
Well, no, I am not the one claiming there's some moral issue with it. To me, there's nothing creepy with getting off to whatever fictional shit you want as there's no actual person harmed by it.
BUT, if you want to act all morally high and spew some virtue signalling nonsense while also creating a double standard when it comes to a different sex, yes, you are a disgusting fetish-shaming brick wall. Because such logic is basically "Fetishes that I like are cool but fetishes that I don't like are MORALLY WRONG and I will attack people for it".
You're hardcore projecting here, bud, the only ones angry here are people like you trying to spew a half-assed virtue signalling nonsense.Getting angry and calling names people who are arguing with you won't help you to prove your point tho
Doesn't matter what they are "aroused" by, I have zero interest in femdom yet I love this game, we all have our reasons for what "arouses" us.When femdom lovers play a shota game, they are getting aroused by
No, there's difference between a "depiction of a little girl" and an "actual child", this is exactly the issue here, you people trying to imply the two is same but on top of that, ONLY when the KID is a GIRL and not when the KID is a BOY.On the other hand when people are getting off with loli genre, they clearly APPRECIATE the body of a little girl.
You know what i'm tired to see you deblatering the same nonsense again and again ans as a say earlier I clearly don't want to argue for hours. If you jerk to pixels representing little girls as a straight man then you have high chances to actually like little girls in real life, don't try to deny it. it doesn't mean you are a dangerous predator tho, because you might have the moral to prevent yourself from being attracted to little girls IN REAL LIFE. Taht's why I never said ppl jerking to lolis are pedos, but your hysterical ass make me say words I actually do not say. I just find the genre gross, this is my right.You're hardcore projecting here, bud, the only ones angry here are people like you trying to spew a half-assed virtue signalling nonsense.
Also, says the ones calling others "pedos" for jerking off to pixels.
Doesn't matter what they are "aroused" by, I have zero interest in femdom yet I love this game, we all have our reasons for what "arouses" us.
That's not the point, regardless of what you are sexually attracted to, the act of "a kid getting fucked by MILFs" which is a "depiction of pedophilia" is clearly present in this context so taking issue with "lolis" while consuming shotacon shit is extremely hypocritical. Not to mention, you're already wrong trying to create a moral issue with fictional works.
It's like consuming scat content where a MILF is shitting all over the place then saying you aren't consuming it because you're not attracted by the "poop". Do you see how dumb this argument is?
No, there's difference between a "depiction of a little girl" and an "actual child", this is exactly the issue here, you people trying to imply the two is same but on top of that, ONLY when the KID is a GIRL and not when the KID is a BOY.
You people are the epitome of irony and my ignore list seems like it will continue to grow.