Trust me, I know. I'm very aware of how little choices effect the game. I was just repeating what Irphaeus said about pregnancy.I really like your "for certain endings".
All the labels join and the four variables he ever used was an attempt to define if you get a given clue or not ; what was useless since there were no way for you to not get them. Therefore, except the few game over, absolutely none of your decision matter.
The story is interesting, and fun to follow, but so far it's a pure kinetic novel with punctual narrative inputs. It follow one and only one path, and we all have the exact same ending.
Currently, there is only one path. But the plan is to introduce a Karma-System which will have 3 endings with 1 girl each specific for that Ending. I dont know anything about the 4th ending.I really like your "for certain endings".
All the labels join and the four variables he ever used was an attempt to define if you get a given clue or not ; what was useless since there were no way for you to not get them. Therefore, except the few game over, absolutely none of your decision matter.
The story is interesting, and fun to follow, but so far it's a pure kinetic novel with punctual narrative inputs. It follow one and only one path, and we all have the exact same ending.
There's supposed to be 6 endings. 4 single girl endings, 1 harem ending, and 1 dark endingCurrently, there is only one path. But the plan is to introduce a Karma-System which will have 3 endings with 1 girl each specific for that Ending. I dont know anything about the 4th ending.
Regarding the 3 girls, those should be Motoko (good Karma), Kayana (neutral Karma) and Shirohime (or whatever she is spelled, for bad Karma). And I would guess only Motoko will have a pregnancy-Ending, I cannot really see the other two having a Pregnancy-Route.
But this is just my speculation.
I still can't emphasis how much of a disgusting move this was, the man lied about a car accident to fish for sympathy bucks and delay the already delayed release.
He rather do promotional posts for Waifu Hunter than focus on this game. Shame.Wow, all this talk about endings, and no one made a joke about it never happening yet.
It's been brewing for the last few days but I'm sure Irphaeus will post a picture Yoko getting railed and all will be well again.Mutiny and rebellion is stirring up in the discord chat
You don't have permission to view the spoiler content. Log in or register now.
Notice how his fan boys (The ones who usually defend him by insulting and mocking others like that Dave guy) are nowhere to be seen.
"The plan is"...Currently, there is only one path. But the plan is to introduce a Karma-System which will have 3 endings with 1 girl each specific for that Ending.
$ karma += X
and $ karma -= X
needed for his "I'll add the karma system soon" to not sound like pure bullshit. That he still don't know exactly how the karma would have an influence, why not. But he could at least have done this, for the actual players to benefit from it when he'll finally know.And mine is that he just don't know how to make the game like he said it will be one day.But this is just my speculation.
I don't agree, the purpose of a review is to inform consumers about the product they're paying money for. Which typically would entail purely focusing on the plusses and negatives of the game itself, but Patreon games are different in that they're actively in development. When people give money they're not just giving it for a game, they're giving it on the assumption that they're funding development.Worst type of reviews are biased ones which don't focus on what is important, the product that is reviewed.
The developer who creates the game shouldn't have any impact on the review, if it is your main point for why a game is bad then you are horribly wrong because what the developer has been doing shouldn't have any impact for how the game is in its current state. I see a lot talking about how good the game is and then dropping a poor rating because of how bad the developer seems to be, which should have been left out from the equation because it isn't important for rating how the game currently is. You can't simply give a game a good or bad rating for who created it, content (i.e. the game itself, nothing around it) is what is important and should be focused on in a game review.
Absolutely not, people who take advantage of the naivety or stupidity of others are responsible for their actions. If a person has a proper work-ethic they will resist whatever temptation they have and behave in a respectable manner.Irphaeus is not the one to be blamed , its the people supporting him lol . Who doesnt want to be in Irphaeus position , just write up some bs story and release few pics here and there and you get thousands for the month . Life is easy damn , i wish i learn how to make this kind of games..
Like I said, the issue is not the inclusion itself but making it the main point of a negative review, thus making it a bad one. If the game is good, then you should focus on what makes you feel that way. Though you could also take it the other way around and focus on what you dislike. Both sides are part of a good review.I don't agree, the purpose of a review is to inform consumers about the product they're paying money for. Which typically would entail purely focusing on the plusses and negatives of the game itself, but Patreon games are different in that they're actively in development. When people give money they're not just giving it for a game, they're giving it on the assumption that they're funding development.
Therefore it's not "biased" to inform people about the nature of development. If they're going to give their money then they have the right to know that the dev is disgustingly unproductive and worse has documented a history of outright lies.