Not even the same argument at all.
The Gay content filter isn't able to send you into anaphylactic shock and possibly kill you. Try finding a better strawman for your argument next time.
They don't contradict each other at all. You have to actually play it to know you don't like it.
Once you've played long enough to decide you don't like it, then you don't play it because you don't like it. It's pure and simple logic.
I was originally going to be addressing a whole lot more of your post, but so many of the points you were making just left me questioning your thought processes more than I really care to.
I never said it was a good example. But it has the same dismissive attitude.
And yes, they do.
I can tell straight off if I'll like a game or not based on the content. (The porn content to be specific. I can still greatly enjoy the gameplay. But, if the "reward" for said gameplay is stuff that I find unattractive... that's not very incentivising.
And: My thought process, is based of waaay to many games having improper tagging. Or dropping the actual content only after you've invested a few hours.
Not saying these will be good examples, but I'll give it a shot:
Say you looove futa. And find "Super Futa Adventure" (that's probably a real game, but xD) so you start playing.
And you have to grind a ton to get anywhere, builidng up relationships etc. And then: You unlock your first sex scene. And... it's cunnilingus. The futa you had been dating has a shota penis and a vulva. So okay, you try another futa... same thing. Shota penis, vulva. Then you find out that NONE of the futa use their penis in a single scene. And all are the "vag+penis" type of futa.
So, now you are left pissed, because you wasted hours on a game, hoping to get some big dick futa action. Now, add to that hypothetical: That you first asked "What type of futa are they? And what sex scenes can I unlock?" and all you got was a "just play to find out!". (And yes, I know that example would never happen, as it's basically against "porn law" to include a dick and not pleasure it xD But I wanted to use an example people would actually react to.)
To refer to your "simple logic": It's very easy to estimate if you'll like a game or not, based on knowing what it contains.
For example: If a game doesn't have a single scene focused on female pleasure. I won't like it. If it exclusively has copy pasted child pussy, with only effort put into the penises: I won't like it. Or, to use a AAA example: If a games ENTIRE progression is built upon me paying 12 grand to purchase lootboxes to reduce the grind to an acceptable level: I won't like it.
It's very simple.
Like, to use a simple example: If there's a game with preview shots of a male PC, but: Plot twist: He's actually a cuntboy.
There you have info that would make people either never pick it up, or the intrigued. Leaving that as a "you'll find out!" will just piss off a lot of people.
Hope that helped explain it better.
Hence the reference to peanuts in the first example. NOT because of the reaction it can have, BUT: Because of the "This contains X? Then I know not to touch it."
And due to the fact: I've had quite a lot of "Just play it to find out!" I played it, didn't like it, tore it a new asshole over bugs, spelling error, story inconsistency, mismatched anatomy etc. And the people that told me to play it, got offended that "Don't play it if you don't like it! Then it's clearly not made for you!". Which as said: Could have been avoiding by a 2-10 minute conversation.