I thought there when I read that but didn't correct him in case I was wrong. The reason he hasn't seen them is probably because they are few as of now but that comes with territory of this kind of game. Boobgames is updating regularly and doing this with very little help, even if he has a team it wouldn't be any large then 10 people. Not to mention the art quality is really good, so imagine the difficult to animate this style.
RPGM Warlock and Boobs [v0.507] [boobsgames]
- Thread starter Papa Ernie
- Start date
-
- Tags
- 2d game 2dcg adventure ahegao anal sex big ass big tits combat creampie fantasy futa/trans futa/trans protagonist gay group sex handjob lactation male protagonist masturbation milf monster girl multiple penetration oral sex pregnancy religion sandbox sex toys spanking swinging tentacles titfuck transformation turn based combat vaginal sex voyeurism
"Some" doesn't deserve the animation tag. It's for people to find out whether they're mainly playing a picture clicker game or get fully animated lewd scenes. I have checked several videos of this game and none of the scenes were animated, so it must be very few. That's like putting a 3D tag on a game that is 90% 2D but has a room in it that was rendered with blender.
If something has a content tag, and it appears in someone's work, then it gets tagged with it.
Still counts.
You can quibble all you want about it not deserving the tag from now until doomsday, and you'll still be wrong.
I'm not wrong, you simply don't get it. But whatever
I do get it, and now you're sticking you're fingers in your ears and going "La-la-la, I can't hear you"... All whilst still being wrong.I'm not wrong, you simply don't get it. But whatever
The only way your opinion will be right, is if you convince F95's admins that tags need to only be applied if/when there's a minimum amount of their related content.
That's fair but per the rules of F95zone it counts since it is in the game & if we establish a minimum then when does it count as enough to count. It would be a big mess to figure out & probably not worth the effortI'm not wrong, you simply don't get it. But whatever
- May 16, 2020
- 432
- 833
if the game has "anal" tag, does it mean that it should have only anal scenes? the games with the tag "virgin" will only have one scene then
the games with the tag "virgin" will only have one scene thenMy point exactly. Although the real question should be if has both then does every scene have both, or scenes of equal amount with them apart, or can be anywhere within a certain percentage of each?if the game has "anal" tag, does it mean that it should have only anal scenes?
Insetr Iroh asking real questions
That's exactly what you've been doing since your first reply to me.
Ah, now that sounds intelligent. So every opinion on this site is wrong unless the admins agree on it.
Common sense I would say. OPs just need to ask themselves if the game qualifies for whatever they're selling it in their tags.
Call of Duty doesn't become a "racing game" just because there's three scenes where two trucks are chasing each other and you're shooting over.
Tags imo should be there for people to figure out what to expect. If a game has 100 scenes and only 6 of them are animated, then one can't really expect the game being animated. As someone who's looking for animated games with that filter, you'll be mislead and disappointed. It's the only way to separate animated games from picture-clicker games.
Last edited:
Tags like "anal" obviously serve a completely different purpose. People who don't like that fetish can exclude it in the exclude tab. People who have several fetishes can filter for games who contain them all, anal included. So if you like games with virgins, milfs, anal, foot fetish and BDSM and you filter for those tags, you gon' find games who have it all.if the game has "anal" tag, does it mean that it should have only anal scenes?
If you however search for animated games and then you'll get displayed games with 10 hours of content, 100 sex scenes but only 5 animations which take up 3 minutes of these 10 hours, you obviously did not found what you were looking for.
A game like Summertime Saga can add that tag with good faith because everyone who likes animations will have them in every scene. A game that has more animations than no animations can also add it, since it will most likely make most fans of animated games happy too. Some still pictures inbetween are common. But a game that barely has animations isn't really what people are looking for if they filter for that tag.
- May 16, 2020
- 432
- 833
what if I feel dizzy from animations and want to exclude them?
you have already been told that this is not really a place to make these arguments - you need to address your complains about the way tags work here to the admistration of this site. I would not personally add the "animated" tag to my game too, but I'm not the one who decides the rules here
Last edited:
You're missing the point. Per the rules boobgames can put the animated tag because there is some animation in the game. It might be when you cast spells or when there are sprites fucking that count for animation. It's not like there's only one scene, and not like he has the VN tag despite this clearly not being a VN but per the rules he qualifies for the animation tag since the site only demands that there is animation in the game before you add the tag.
I believe he was making a joke.
Last edited:
Then it would be sad to see your game not being showed to people who want exactly what your game is - few next to none animations - just because you got the animated tag on your game. They will also get a false impression and dismiss your game before even looking at it.what if I feel dizzy from animations and want to exclude them?
It's technically impossible that I miss the point I made myself. If any, then you are missing the point I'm making.
Unfortunately, you are. As you were responding to me pointing out that what call common sense results would result in arbitrary minimum of content for games to earn tags. The point your missing is it's easier to say "does he have a couple scenes of x tag" or "is there a couple there a couple combat sections" before saying if they can have the tag. It's far easier for the admins to say if you can have the tag by simply check if you have that content in general instead of set a minimum which would cause them bigger pains because everyone has different definitions of qualifies as enough. Hence boobgames joke about needing only anal content if you have the anal tag. Common sense isn't an answer anyways, that only works when something isn't based on subjectivity. You might think the movie 300 is to bloody but I think it's has a perfect amount of blood. Then what's common sense answer there isn't.
Hence my original point
When it comes to whether or not the tags should have a minimum requirement of the amount of their related content, then obviously.
No, obviously not. Obviously there's a difference between me expressing my personal opinion and me claiming that I'd read out loud the official rules of this site, which I didn't.
Last edited:
Changing the "animation" tag requirements doesn't mean we need to change all tags on this site. As I explained, there's a different purpose between a kink tag and a game design tag.
That's not how common sense works.
Simply ask yourself if a game has enough animated scenes to keep fans of that entertained, it's really easy. It's the same with non-adult games who are categorized as RPG. None of the studios is anxious about whether their own estimation is going to fit for everyone. They tell you in good faith that they believe they have enough rpg elements to call it an RPG and make RPG fans happy. That's common sense. If you're unsure, then better don't promote it as such.
Last edited:
Opnions can be wrong, and yours was and still is. Not to mention you made a statement, and supplied an analogy. You did not offer an opinion, and the two are not the same.
How you say/write something matters.
Nope. You may learn the difference between subjective opionions and objectively wrong views.
I did, and providing analogies is a common and effective method for enhancing understanding.
So does how you interpret things, and that you learn not to tell people that you'd know better how they meant things they said.
Last edited:
- Feb 19, 2019
- 3,065
- 2,935
This must go on "the biggest mount of bullcrap I ever came across", and on this website that is saying something
So according to you, if a person says "in my opinion snow is purple and water is dry and made of sugar" he cannot be wrong ? Hate to break this to you, but he is, even when his statement begins with "in my opinion...". He just proved that he is completely ignorant or delusional.
Mind you, you didn't even start your senseless argument with "in my opinion...". You just said "Some" doesn't deserve the animation tag, as if you were the arbiter of when something deserves a tag or not. You are not, and that's what Snugglepuff is pointing out to you, but you refuse to acknowledge.
Have a nice day.